990 Flap Coverage for Fournier’s Gangrene
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Fournier’s gangrene (FG) is a life-threatening necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) affecting the perineum and genital region, necessitating urgent debridement and ultimately coverage, often in the burn center context. Skin grafts are often used for reconstruction but may result in suboptimal outcomes. Flap-based reconstructions have shown potential for better functional and aesthetic results, but no systematic review has been undertaken to date. Methods This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA protocol. A comprehensive search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and CINAHL databases was performed. The search terms included “Necrotizing soft tissue infections,” “Gas gangrene,” “Fournier’s gangrene,” “Flap,” and “Graft.” Covidence software facilitated study selection and reference tracking. The inclusion criteria targeted studies on human subjects involving flap reconstruction for NSTI defects of the perineum, while exclusion criteria eliminated studies referred to graft reconstruction, trauma and oncology defects. All study designs were included. A charting form was developed to categorize studies by variables such as study type, flap type, pathology, and defect location. Results After removal of duplicates, the title and abstract of 3760 studies were assessed and 522 studies underwent full-text review. Of the 99 studies included in the qualitative synthesis and data extraction, 31% (n=31) were retrospective and 56% (n=55) were case reports/series. Of the 395 cases described, 501 flaps used 59 distinct techniques, with the anterolateral thigh, medial thigh, and pudendal thigh flaps the most common. Only 2 free flaps were performed. Gracilis was the most frequent locoregional option; others included the anterolateral thigh, medial circumflex femoral perforator, internal pudendal artery perforator, and groin flaps. Complication rates were relatively low, with only 10 partial and 6 total flap losses reported. The majority of studies were published in plastic surgery journals, followed by urology journals; only one appeared in a burn journal. Notably, 58 studies (59%) were published within the last decade. Conclusions After debridement, the aim of FG management is to obtain durable coverage, with a view to minimize disability and optimize appearance. Although skin grafting often fulfils this role, techniques higher on the reconstructive ladder, including local, regional and free flaps, are sometimes required. This systematic review demonstrates that flap-based reconstruction is a reliable method for managing Fournier’s gangrene defects. Applicability of Research to Practice NSTI is commonly and effectively managed in the burn center setting. This systematic review highlights the important contribution of the plastic surgeon as part of multidisciplinary teams managing complex defects resulting from Fournier’s Gangrene. Funding for the Study N/A
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».