535 Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating Early Application of a Surfactant-based Dressing for Partial-thickness Burns (EARLY)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Surfactant-based wound dressings (WSD) have been utilized in chronic, non-healing wounds and small burn wounds to soften and aid removal of wound debris. We conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled study evaluating paired, non-contiguous partial thickness burn wounds comparing WSD versus bacitracin. We hypothesized early application of WSD would lead to less wound conversion and less painful wound care. Methods Sample size was determined based on a projected 25% improvement in salvaged tissue (i.e., excised tissue) with bacitracin as the comparator. Wounds were paired; two non-contiguous partial thickness areas less than 10% TBSA each. Wound care was performed daily, per protocol. Additional outcomes included grafted area, infection, and procedure-associated pain. Patients and assessing surgeons were blinded to treatment assignment. Paired analysis performed for primary outcome and mixed modeling for change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale. SAS 9.4 was used for analysis. Results Patients were consented and treated within 24 hours of injury. All cases were deemed initially necessary for admission. Patients were followed until 95% re-epithelialization occurred or were discharged. Vancouver scar scale was utilized post discharge. Twenty-seven patients were consented. The average time from injury to consent was 14.6 ± 5.6 hours. The average age was 40.9 ± 16.5 years with 65% being male, 50% Black, and 50% Caucasian. Flame injury was most common. The average total body surface area burned was 8.8 ± 3.6%. There was no difference in percent of salvaged tissue, calculated as the amount excised (cm2) relative to the original size of injury [6.1% (95% CI -9.7, 21.9), p=0.4363); 26.9% versus 38.5% of patients had their wounds convert to a deeper injury. However, there was a significant difference [-0.61 (95% CI -1.04, -0.17), p=0.0065) in patient reported pain between treatment assignment (measured at baseline and after each wound care session). There was one wound infection in each group. Conclusions WSD facilitates easier debridement, is resistant to infection without need of antimicrobial exposure, and shows improved patient tolerability. Applicability of Research to Practice WSD is a useful dressing that can be easily applied early after injury and can improve patient’s wound care experience. Funding for the Study Medline funded this study through an investigator-initiated grant, but has not reviewed the results.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».