Policy Options to Complement the New Canadian Dental Program Enabling High Quality Care for People With Disabilities and Older Adults
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The newly announced Canadian Dental Care Plan (CDCP) particularly aims to reduce financial barriers to dental care for individuals living below a family income threshold. The Canadian government has also launched an "Oral Health Access Fund" to support projects aiming to address financial barriers to dental care for older adults, those with disabilities and other groups. Evidence from programs implemented elsewhere in the world could inform policy decisions and address such non-financial barriers for older Canadians and those with disabilities. AIM: To identify dental programs and policies in OECD countries focusing on people with disabilities and older people, and to outline how they might be applied to the Canadian context. METHODS: The strategy for this narrative literature review comprised a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSh) or their equivalent, title/abstract keywords, truncations, and Boolean operators. Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL and Scopus were used. The searches were limited to English language publications involving programs and policies in all OECD countries. All searches ran from inception to January 25, 2023, with no restrictions on publication time. RESULTS: The search identified 129 articles eligible for review. Findings were categorized as (1) interventions at the institutional-level (subdivided into patient-, professional- and community-focused programs) and (2) interventions at the governmental-level (subdivided into universal, population-specific, and community-based programs). Evidence suggests that targeted, integrated coaching or education programs for oral health care are beneficial, especially when programs are constantly evaluated and improved. Programs with a unified network system that integrates various relevant organizational and health domains have demonstrated to be most effective in the improvement of oral health care and overall health. Dental and medical healthcare workers play a crucial role in improving oral health outcomes and need motivation and fair compensation when caring for older people. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited quality evidence supporting approaches to improving oral health care and oral health for older people and those with disabilities. It is important for policymakers and stakeholders to consider programmes from other countries when expanding the CDCP.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».