The effect of language discordance on the experience of palliative care: A scoping review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Internationally, research demonstrates consistent disparities in access to palliative care services for those in underserved communities with life-limiting conditions. OBJECTIVES: This outcomes-oriented scoping review examines the impact of language discordance on palliative care (PC) experiences. It seeks to answer the question: what are the PC experiences of individuals who do not speak the same language as their care provider? The review explored the range and depth of existing research and synthesizing trends across studies. DESIGN: Online databases were used to find articles published in English or French, from January 1, 2010, to February 5, 2024. Inclusion criteria included studies that explored the relationship between palliative, end-of-life or hospice care, as well as advance care planning in the context of language discordance between individual and health care provider. This scoping review was originally designed to explore Canadian official language minority communities, but was broadened to an international search for a more robust dataset. RESULTS: A total of 39 articles were included in the review, 23 qualitative studies, nine quantitative studies and seven mixed-methods studies. The following elements were extracted from eligible articles: country, study design, target population and definitions, participant characteristics, definitions of PC, outcomes studied, findings related to the study aims, as well as author-defined study limitations and next steps. Areas for further research were identified, as were areas for policy and practice change. Studies used various perspectives of PC, often synonymizing it with end-of-life and hospice care, as well as advanced care planning. There was no contextual definition of language barriers in the studies and no studies that explored the PC in any Canadian official language minority communities. The importance of in-language resources, accessibility of skilled interpreters, education in cross-cultural care were all common themes in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: From a variety of perspectives, studies generally found that language discordance has a negative impact on the quality of accessibility of palliative, end-of-life and hospice care, as well as advanced care planning. Given that Canada's population is becoming increasingly linguistically diverse, there is a need to better understand the impact of receiving PC from individuals who speak another language on both the quality of PC and quality of life at the end of life.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,044 | 0,190 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,026 | 0,027 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».