Sleep abnormalities are associated with greater cognitive deficits and disease activity in Huntington's disease: a 12-year polysomnographic study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Increasing evidence suggests that the sleep pathology associated with neurodegenerative diseases can in turn exacerbate both the cognitive deficits and underlying pathobiology of these conditions. Treating sleep may therefore bear significant, even disease-modifying, potential for these conditions, but how best and when to do so remains undetermined. Huntington's disease, by virtue of being an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease presenting in mid-life, presents a key ‘model’ condition through which to advance this field. To date, however, there has been no clinical longitudinal study of sleep abnormalities in Huntington's disease and no robust interrogation of their association with disease onset, cognitive deficits and markers of disease activity. Here, we present the first such study. Huntington's disease gene carriers (n = 28) and age- and sex-matched controls (n = 21) were studied at baseline and 10- and 12-year follow-up. All Huntington's disease gene carriers were premanifest at baseline and were stratified at follow-up into ‘prodromal/manifest’ versus ‘premanifest’ groups. Objective sleep abnormalities were assessed through two-night inpatient polysomnography and 2-week domiciliary actigraphy, and their association was explored against Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Trail A/B task, Symbol Digit Modalities Task (SDMT), Hopkins Verbal Learning Task (HVLT) and Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores, plus serum neurofilament light levels. Statistical analysis incorporated cross-sectional ANOVA, longitudinal repeated measures linear models and regressions adjusted for multiple confounders including disease stage. Fifteen Huntington's disease gene carriers phenoconverted to prodromal/early manifest Huntington's disease by study completion. At follow-up, these gene carriers showed more frequent sleep stage changes (P ≤ 0.001, ηp2 = 0.62) and higher levels of sleep maintenance insomnia (defined by wake after sleep onset, P = 0.002, ηp2 = 0.52). The latter finding was corroborated by nocturnal motor activity patterns on follow-up actigraphy (P = 0.004, ηp2 = 0.32). Greater sleep maintenance insomnia was associated with greater cognitive deficits (Trail A P ≤ 0.001, R2 = 0.78; SDMT P = 0.008, R2 = 0.63; Trail B P = 0.013, R2 = 0.60) and higher levels of neurofilament light (P = 0.015, R2 = 0.39). Longitudinal modelling suggested that sleep stage instability accrues from the early premanifest phase, whereas sleep maintenance insomnia emerges closer to phenoconversion. Baseline sleep stage instability was able to discriminate those who phenoconverted within the study period from those who remained premanifest (area under curve = 0.81, P = 0.024). These results demonstrate that the key sleep abnormalities of premanifest/early Huntington's disease are sleep stage instability and sleep maintenance insomnia and suggest that the former bears value in predicting disease onset, while the latter is associated with greater disease activity and cognitive deficits. Intervention studies to interrogate causation within this association could not only benefit patients with Huntington's disease but also help provide fundamental proof-of-concept findings for the wider sleep–neurodegeneration field.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».