Assessment of ventilation heterogeneity and particle deposition in asthmatics using combined SPECT/CT imaging and computational modeling approaches
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PURPOSE: This study investigated asthma phenotypes and their associations with ventilation heterogeneity and particle deposition by utilizing Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) imaging, quantitative Computed Tomography (qCT) imaging-based subgrouping, and a whole-lung computational model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two datasets were analyzed: one from a combined SPECT and CT (SPECT/CT) study with six asthmatic subjects, and another from the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP) with 209 asthmatic subjects. Data from 35 previously acquired healthy subjects served as a control group. Each subject underwent CT scans at full inspiration and expiration, along with pulmonary function testing (PFT). The SPECT/CT study included ventilation SPECT imaging. Key qCT variables such as airway diameter, wall thickness, percentage of air trapping (AirT%), and percentage of small airway disease (fSAD%) were assessed. A subject-specific whole-lung computational fluid and particle dynamics (CFPD) model predicted airway resistance, particle deposition fraction, and the coefficient of variation (CV) for ventilation heterogeneity. Subjects were categorized into four predefined asthma imaging subgroups/clusters with increasing severity (C1-C4). CFPD-predicted CVs were validated against SPECT measurements. We compared PFT, qCT, and CFPD variables across SARP clusters and analyzed particle deposition fractions in large conducting, small conducting, and respiratory airways. RESULTS: Cluster C4 exhibited a significantly distinct ventilation profile compared to other clusters and health controls. This distinction contrasted with the insignificant differences between ventilation profiles in severity subgroups defined by conventional spirometry-based guidelines. Airway resistance varied significantly across the asthma clusters. Although both C3 and C4 clusters represented severe asthma, only C4 showed a significant increase in AirT%, primarily due to fSAD%. Since inflammatory phenotypes differ - C3 with wall thickening in large and small conducting airways, and C4 with elevated fSAD% and Emph% in small conducting and respiratory airways - fine particles (∼5 μm) and extrafine particles (∼1 μm) are more effective at reaching the respective regions in C3 and C4. Given that C2 and C4 have hyper-responsive phenotypes with narrowed conducting airways, fine particles are more effective in reaching these areas. Airway enlargement in targeted segments of the left lower lobe resulted in improved particle deposition. CONCLUSION: Our cluster-informed CFPD-based approach enhances the understanding of ventilation heterogeneity in asthma and holds potential for refining strategies for inhalational therapies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».