Success of amoxicillin challenges in the emergency department for children with low risk of serious reactions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective: This study aimed to address the overdiagnosis of penicillin allergies in the pediatric population, which leads to less effective antibiotic usage. We investigated the effectiveness of standardized oral amoxicillin challenges in the emergency departments (EDs) of pediatric patients with previous reactions but a low risk for serious reactions. Methods: Children under 18 years of age who reported allergy to any penicillin presenting to the ED of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHUSJ), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, with a clinical requirement for amoxicillin treatment were included if their risk of anaphylaxis was judged to be low. We evaluated immediate and delayed reactions, patient demographics, the impact on resource utilization, and the number of patients no longer considered to be allergic to penicillins at the 1-month follow-up. Results: From August 2021 through April 2023, 100 children received an oral amoxicillin challenge in the ED. Among them, 93% safely received amoxicillin without an immediate reaction and were discharged with amoxicillin from the ED. Seven participants had immediate reactions which included skin rashes or vomiting, with one participant experiencing an anaphylactic reaction. Five of the seven subsequently had an amoxicillin challenge by an allergist and only the one with anaphylaxis in the ED reacted. Suspected delayed reactions were observed in 4 of the other 89 (4%) participants who could be contacted within 30 days of the challenge and consisted of skin rashes. Three of the four subsequently had an amoxicillin challenge by an allergist and one reacted. Then, two patients (2%) had confirmed allergies following suspected reactions: one patient with the anaphylactic reaction, and the other with the delayed reaction. Overall, 79/89 (89%) of patients with 30-day follow-up could have their allergy label removed without an allergist consultation. Conclusions: Standardized oral amoxicillin challenges in low-risk pediatric ED patients allowed for the removal of penicillin allergy labels in 89% of patients reached for follow-up without an allergist consultation. This approach enhanced patient care, allowing 93% of participants to be discharged from the ED with an amoxicillin prescription. Only 2 of 100 children had proven amoxicillin allergy; another 3 had reactions but no assessment by an allergist.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».