Creating engagement capable environments for healthcare transformation: A framework for action
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Engaging and partnering with patients, caregivers and communities is a key building block for integrated care and health system transformation, yet many organizations lack the skills or capacity to do this work well, and with a focus on creating engagement capable environments. Why Are You Conducting A Workshop? While many health system organizations are committed to engaging and partnering with patients, caregivers and communities, few have carefully considered the competencies, structures and enablers required to support high-quality engagement. In Ontario, the government has undertaken a transformation of the publicly funded health care system through the development of local health care networks called Ontario Health Teams (OHTs). Patient partnership is a core requirement but is being unevenly implemented across OHTs. The need for a supporting framework for these efforts was identified, leading to the development of the Creating Engagement Capable OHTs Framework. The Framework was co-developed by a working group of patient, family and caregiver partners, OHT and government staff and researchers in early 2023. A stepped approach to the development of the framework was taken that allowed for the existing evidence in the field to be considered, along with the needs of different OHT constituencies through consultations, surveys and collaboration. Using a workshop format, we will present the Framework and, using the Ontario context as a case study, we will facilitate discussions with participants about how it might be used in and adapted to other health system contexts to support high-quality engagement and the creation of engagement capable environments. Who Is It For? This workshop will be appropriate for community and patient partners and staff working with health system organizations to support, facilitate or champion patient, caregiver and community engagement. Structure: The structure of the 90-minute workshop will be as follows: 10 mins: Presentation on engagement capable environments and the importance of competencies, structures and enablers for engagement in health system organizations (Presenters) 10 mins: Table group introductions (Full group) 15 mins: Description of the Ontario case study; overview of the framework, including the co-design development process (Presenters) 15 mins: Table group discussions: delegates will review the framework, identify a competency and a support or enabler they feel they are doing well with or struggling with and share their experiences and thoughts with their table allowing for group learning (All) 10 mins: Report back from discussions (All) 15 mins: Table group discussions: delegates will review an assigned competency from the framework and discuss how it could be adapted for their context (All) 10 mins: Report back from discussions (All) 5 mins: Wrap-up (Presenters) How Are You Going To Engage With The Audience? We will engage with the audience through table group discussions, report back and time for questions and answers. How Are You Going To Summarize The Take Home Messages? The take home messages will be summarized at the end of the session and will be posted to our website following the conference.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,075 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,022 | 0,079 |
| Communication savante | 0,032 | 0,024 |
| Science ouverte | 0,009 | 0,032 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,018 | 0,015 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».