Co-creating Our Future: Health Human Resource Planning in Canada, Reimagined
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Currently, Canada’s health care system operates in provincial/territorial silos with no coordinated health workforce planning efforts, leading to provider burnout and issues with access to care. A needs-based integrated health human resources planning framework will help ensure the population has access to care when and where they need it and ensure equitable, compassionate and sustainable conditions for the health workforce. As part of Impact 2040, the Canadian Medical Association’s (CMA’s) bold strategic plan, health workforce planning was identified as a key priority. Previous attempts at a national physician workforce plan have been unsuccessful, hence a different approach is needed. To have a truly integrated health human resources plan (IHHRP), shared commitment and collective desire to move toward implementation, we need to work collaboratively with those who provide care, access care and organize health care delivery in Canada. What we did: CMA's integrated health human resources team adopted a design thinking methodology to advance efforts on IHHR planning in Canada. Design thinking brings together diverse skills to look at old problems in new ways, while providing structure and guidance in the form of short, timebound activities. Through this process, we arrived at the concept of collaborative, integrated health workforce planning with interprofessional groups and patient representatives. The idea of co-creating health workforce planning was welcomed by testers, and feedback on the type of process and event was received. Over two days in October 2023, the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) hosted the first co-creation event with representatives from a diverse group of more than 40 national and provincial healthcare organizations and the CMA’s Patient Voice group. Professions represented included, but were not limited to medicine, nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, physician assistants, and psychology, from a wide range of specialties, and sectors, including health worker regulation and education. The aim of the meeting was to create a shared vision of integrated health human resource planning (IHHRP) in Canada for a re-imagined future healthcare system - Building on collaborative work done in other settings attendees worked through a series of break-out sessions as small groups in a facilitated process to determine: -Existing barriers to effective IHHRP -A vision and ideal state for the future of IHHRP -Foundational principles of a patient-partnered framework -Implementation considerations, including conditions for success. -Next steps Results: Following extensive discussions and prioritization by participants, five variables were identified as priority health workforce planning components that would make up a pan-Canadian framework to reach the ideal state for integrated health workforce planning: -Patient partnered, rooted in community -Governance -Data and insights -Social determinants of health -Integrated workforce Learning: Feedback collected was positive overall. Participants specified that co-creating health workforce planning has the potential for ‘transformative change’. Participants indicated a willingness to continue to work collaboratively, co-creating not only the output, but the process, working together to identify essential next steps for framework development, moving toward implementation. Additional steps in co-creation process design, and framework development are in progress through early 2024, and additional results and learnings will be available.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,022 | 0,020 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,036 | 0,016 |
| Communication savante | 0,018 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».