MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4409337339 · doi:10.5334/ijic.icic24043

An innovative digital integrated youth services platform developed with and for youth

2025· article· en· W4409337339 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Deb Chiodo, Joanna Henderson, Karleigh Darnay, Zainab Amure

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal of Integrated Care · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIntegrated careIntegrated servicesComputer scienceProcess managementEngineering managementBusinessHealth careEngineeringPolitical scienceComputer security

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Integrated youth services (IYS) have developed at a rapid rate in Canada and across the globe as an innovative way to organize and deliver mental health and substance use (MHSU) services to young people, centering youth co-development and engagement as core components of model development. Youth Wellness Hubs Ontario (YWHO) is Ontario’s commitment to improved service access and outcomes for youth aged 12-25 through the implementation of IYS hubs that provide rapid access to walk-in, low-barrier MHSU, physical health, and social services in a convenient, youth-friendly setting. There are 22 funded YWHO networks operating youth hubs in 31 communities (large urban, small urban, rural, Francophone, Indigenous) throughout Ontario. These hubs provide mental health, substance use, primary care, education, employment, housing, and other health and social services. YWHO teams, embedded within existing local services, provide a single point of entry for young people to access a range of services. Aligned with flexible services and approaches to mental health service delivery that empower youth in their own service journey, YWHO has developed a virtual platform (YWHO Virtual) co-designed with youth, families, and service providers that provides for young people, safe, secure and timely access to mental health and substance use services, as well as other primary care, community and social support services. Platform development and features have been co-designed with several provincial and local youth and family groups: YWHO has established a Digital Action Advisory Group (DAAG) made up of youth and family members who have been involved in the development of the platform; a Provincial Youth Advisory Council, a Provincial Indigenous Youth and Family Advisory Circle, and local youth at YWHO sites. The virtual hub offers an accessible solution for youth facing challenges in reaching in-person hubs, whether due to geographical constraints or personal circumstances. This youth-centric platform, co-designed by and for young people, provides a safe and welcoming space for them to receive the care they require. The virtual hub contributes to ensuring youth can access services from any location. This is especially advantageous for those residing in remote or underserved areas, those who are hesitant to access services due to stigma and those who experience physical and mental health challenges that make it challenging to access in-person services away from home. Youth have the independence to request and schedule appointments at their own convenience, eliminating the necessity for travel or support from a family member who may be a barrier to accessing services due to stigma. The virtual hub ensures that youth can maintain uninterrupted access to the support they require. In situations where it is not feasible for youth to attend regular in-person appointments, they can request a virtual appointment to provide them with access to continuity of their care. This presentation will share the web application platform and features, the co-designed elements and innovations, the integration of data collected on the platform with in-person service-level data, and the lessons learned in the pilot launch across five sites of this initiative. Next steps is implementation across all Networks.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,901
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,583

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal of Integrated CareMême sujetInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207