The Participatory Research to Action (PR2A) Framework: applications and opportunities for authentic engagement of experts-by-experience from inception to uptake
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Participatory approaches to health services research represent a paradigm shift that values the knowledge of experts-by-experience, including patients, caregivers, members of the general public, healthcare providers, and decision-makers. While many frameworks have been developed, they are generally tailored to a sector, health condition, research stage, or research design. After an extensive literature scan and our team's deep expertise in community-based, applied health services research, the SE Research Centre developed a novel framework to guide the involvement of experts-by-experience, incorporating concepts from service design, co-design, and integrated knowledge translation. Our Participatory Research to Action (PR2A) framework offers flexible yet structured guidance for engaging with experts-by-experience in the complete research cycle, from development of questions and methods to relationship-building, prototype testing and evaluation. The PR2A framework emphasizes creative approaches and embeds meaningful engagement of experts-by-experience through six iterative stages: 1) Readiness; 2) Discover; 3) Define; 4) Develop; 5) Deliver; and 6) Measure. In this interactive workshop, delegates interested in creative, rigorous co-design research will learn about the features of the PR2A framework and how to apply it within their research settings and projects. First, we will describe the PR2A framework and its development. We will then provide two case studies showcasing the application of the PR2A framework in federally-funded research studies across Canada: (1) the co-design and testing of Our Dementia Journey Journal, an interactive resource to facilitate sustainable relationship building between caregivers and care providers of persons living with dementia, including versions to respect culture-specific approaches to dementia in First Nations and South Asian communities in Canada; and (2) the co-design of tools and approaches for non-mental health specialists in home and community care to start non-stigmatizing mental health conversations with clients and their caregivers. Then we will introduce delegates to a real research scenario about post-cardiac surgery care and provide materials and an opportunity for delegates to be supported in small groups to work through the PR2A framework to address the scenario. The small group work will be designed to resemble the Develop stage of the framework, enabling the delegates to experience part of the framework as participants. Finally, in a share-back session, delegates will have an opportunity to share their experience with the PR2A framework, and how it may offer new paths for their future research. Workshop outline: 1. 10 minutes – PR2A framework introduction 2. 12 minutes – Case 1: Applying the PR2A in the development and cultural adaptation of Our Dementia Journey Journal 3. 12 minutes – Case 2: Applying the PR2A in developing a process and tools for starting non-stigmatizing mental health conversations 4. 10 minutes – Introduction of the post-cardiac surgery care scenario 5. 36 minutes – Small group experience using the PR2A framework 6. 10 minutes – Wrap up, questions, and reflections Takeaways: Delegates will be provided with template PR2A materials, be equipped with experience working through the framework, and be given access to additional online resources and examples to inform their future participatory research practice; authentically engaging experts-by-experience throughout the full research cycle.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».