Co-Creating a Lower Limb Preservation Change Initiative in an Ontario Health Team
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
People with diabetes and peripheral vascular diseases are at an increased risk for lower limb amputations. These amputations can have a significant impact on quality of life and overall health. In primary health care, diabetes management is comprehensive but there remains a care gap in publicly-funded foot care that can provide an upstream and preventative approach to lower limb preservation. This care gap is particularly pronounced for vulnerable populations in the community, particularly Indigenous and under/precariously-housed people. The Barrie and Area Ontario Health Team (BAOHT) prioritized this population health need by developing and implementing a change initiative that was people-centered and collaborative across sectors. In Ontario, Canada, Ontario Health Teams (OHTs) are a newer model of intersectoral health care designed to provide integrated care. Through the OHT model, community organizations coordinate with OHTs as a unified team to provide integrated and cohesive care with a focus on population health. As such, the BAOHT was an ideal change agent to propose and implement a lower limb change initiative. The Barrie and Area OHT engaged with policymakers to establish the need for this change initiative. An environmental scan revealed a high rate of amputations along with the care gap of publicly-funded foot care for at-risk individuals who have diabetes and peripheral vascular disease, particularly those who do not have a primary care provider, are under or precariously-housed, and Indigenous populations. There was also an identified lack of health human resources in the service area, particularly for chiropodists with different organizations in the region across sectors having difficulty with recruitment and retention. The BAOHT developed a collaborative capacity among organizational partners across health care sectors (i.e. acute, primary health care, and community partners) with co-creation of the program including patients, the Indigenous community and those with lived experience. The goal was to improve the population’s health through improved access to care and reducing health inequities. As a result of this innovative work, a foot care program that is coordinated around the needs of the people in the community, particularly vulnerable and at-risk populations was developed and implemented. This program includes two foot care nurses, a consulting vascular specialist, primary health care consultation and education, and community partner support. The foot care nurses hold clinics in rotating locations across sectors and population needs, including in Indigenous clinics, homeless shelters, and primary health care settings. Significant learning has included the importance of rigorous indicators and evaluation methodology, sustainable funding models, advocating for dynamic timelines that look towards long-term upstream change, and innovative collaborative governance across sectors that is adaptive to organizational and community needs. Evaluation of the program is currently being done with the goal of expanding the program to other OHT populations that are marginalized and/or at high risk for amputations. Programs like this are an example of innovative people-centered collaboration and can be a model for integrated care that focuses on population health at a national and international scale.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,015 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,021 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,014 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».