Improving Equitable Access to Better Integrated Lower Limb Preservation Care and Supports
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Our region in Ontario, Canada, is experiencing high numbers of lower limb amputations. With earlier identification and improved access to ongoing preventative interventions, we know we may be able to avoid lower limb amputation and improve the quality of life and health outcomes for these patients. In early 2023, a Lower Limb Preservation Working Group was established to co-develop better integrated care pathways for populations at risk of lower limb amputations, specifically focusing on early intervention and preventative treatment. The working group focused on individuals with uncontrolled or poorly controlled diabetes who experience barriers to managing their disease, the high-risk population. Recent data from Ontario Health revealed that within our region there are 49,060 people living with a diagnosis of diabetes. Individuals who are not receiving primary care and individuals identifying as Indigenous or living within a First Nations community are demonstrating higher rates of risk factors associated with lower limb amputation. Through relationships with local patients/clients, care partners, providers, and health system administrators, a co-design process was used to collect individuals’ experiences, co-design solutions, and implement system improvement strategies. The working group engaged with populations of primary interest through detailed co-design methods including interviews, surveys, and focus groups that supported the group’s ability to assess the current state, map care journeys, and design, test, and implement interventions. An integrated care pathway was developed that focused on a co-designed central intake process that includes community partners providing wound care support and treatment specific to patient population based on need/preference in alignment with best practices for wound care; a more comprehensive diabetes support program; and acute care supports, when needed. Implementation has already demonstrated improved access to lower limb care for patients currently experiencing barriers to care including patients with no or precious attachment to primary care, patients deprived of stable housing, and patients that identify as First Nations, Inuit, Metis or Urban Indigenous. In addition, new technology adopted in the care pathway has allowed consistent measurement, standardized documentation, and tracking of wound progress while supporting communication of these data points across the continuum of care. Ongoing evaluation of the pathway aims to explore patient experience and quality of life, as well as system level outcomes. The Lower Limb Preservation group has highlighted system integration, and multidisciplinary teams as essential for preventative healthcare and enables more seamless transitions between modalities of care.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».