MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4409365510 · doi:10.1093/ptj/pzaf051

Feasibility of Direct-Access Physical Therapy for Concussion Management in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Pilot Implementation Study

2025· article· en· W4409365510 sur OpenAlexafffund
Isabelle Gagnon, Alexandra Lacasse-Courchesne, Meghan McKee, Debbie Friedman, M Hahn, Lina Osseiran, Daniel A. Brody, Christine Beaulieu, Ilana Greenstone, Laurie H. Plotnick

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhysical Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Établissements canadiensPublic Health Agency of CanadaMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesMcGill University
Mots-clésMedicinePhysical therapistPhysical therapyConcussionEmergency departmentMedical recordEmergency medicinePoison controlInjury preventionNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of implementing an interdisciplinary approach to concussion assessment and management, including direct-access pediatric physical therapy in the pediatric emergency department (PED), with regard to parental satisfaction with early concussion management, documentation of clinical information for prognosis, and service organization metrics. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Patients <18 years old presenting to the PED with a suspected concussion were included and either received care using the interdisciplinary model of care (pediatric physical therapy + usual care) or usual care alone, depending on their time of presentation to the PED (12 hours/week of pediatric physical therapy coverage). Clinical and administrative data were collected from the participants' medical record. In addition, a random sample of participants received a quality improvement survey administered over the phone. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-seven patients were included in the study population (mean [SD] age = 7.56 [5.62] years), and 81 were seen by the pediatric physical therapist. Those seen by the pediatric physical therapist had a significantly higher average satisfaction score for the Family domain (94.69 [11.60]) of the Pediatric Quality of Life Health care Satisfaction scale, than those who were not (89.02 [20.17]), as well as for Overall satisfaction (pediatric physical therapy = 95.45 [12.34] vs usual care = 89.21 [21.21]). Prognostic information was collected more systematically in patients seen by the pediatric physical therapist. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a pediatric physical therapist in the PED could improve early management of children presenting for suspected concussions. Further research will help determine factors related to sustainability and prepare for broader implementation. IMPACT: Physical therapists, shown to be a positive addition in adult emergency departments, mostly for musculoskeletal conditions, were introduced in a PED in an interdisciplinary model of concussion care and were associated with improvements in satisfaction, clinical information documentation, and service organization. LAY SUMMARY: The study investigated whether direct access to pediatric physical therapy in the pediatric emergency department (PED) would enhance parental satisfaction, early concussion management, documentation, and service organization. Conducted at a single center, it analyzed data from patients under 18 years old with suspected concussions, comparing those who received care from a pediatric physical therapist plus usual care to those who received only usual care. Results showed that parents of children seen by the pediatric physical therapist reported higher satisfaction, and prognostic information was more systematically collected, suggesting that incorporating pediatric physical therapists into the PED could improve overall care and service organization.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,322
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,463

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,174
Tête enseignante GPT0,508
Écart entre enseignants0,334 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhysical TherapyMême sujetTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchTravaux en français237 207