Evidence on Strategies for Integrating Nutrition Interventions with Health and Immunization Systems in Conflict-affected Areas of Low- and Lower-middle-income Settings—A Systematic Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
CONTEXT: Pervasive conflict and war adversely affect a nation's sustainable development. Health and health systems deteriorate, causing long-lasting impacts on diets and nutrition. For the most vulnerable, integrated models of delivery of essential nutrition interventions are critical for the efficiency and sustainability of programs in these settings. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to provide evidence on coverage, utilization, and impact of integrated programs in conflict-affected, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). DATA SOURCES: A database search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL from January 1, 2000 to February 14, 2024. Gray literature was also reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Quantitative and qualitative studies, including observational or intervention designs, and reviews and program evaluations conducted in LMICs, focusing on women (≥19 years) and children (0-19 years) were included. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted independently by 2 investigators using a standardized tool. DATA ANALYSIS: In total, 93 studies (103 reports) were included from 25 countries, including 32 unique gray literature records. The conflict-affected regions included South-East Asia (n = 27), Eastern-Mediterranean (n = 8), Africa (n = 58), and the Americas (n = 1). The review distinguished programs based on nutrition-specific, nutrition-sensitive, and health components. Although the coverage and utilization of integrated nutrition and health programs has been substantial, the impact of the strategies on health and nutrition has been limited. The meta-analysis found no significant differences in rates of wasting among children under 5 years; however, it showed that children who received an integrated strategy experienced a 28% lower risk of underweight (P = .007) and a 12% reduced risk of stunting (P = .05) compared with those who did not. CONCLUSION: This review has provided an in-depth insight into integrated nutrition and health strategies in conflict-affected settings, identifying key facilitators and barriers that can inform future policy and program design. Integrating nutrition programs into health systems and enhancing government and community ownership could enhance efficiency and sustainability, given challenging environments. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration No. CRD42022373993.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».