Evaluating the availability, effectiveness, and impact of primary trauma care training in Sub-Saharan Africa: A comprehensive review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), contributing to over 90 % of global injury-related deaths. Limited healthcare infrastructure, insufficient access to skilled healthcare professionals, and resource constraints exacerbate the trauma burden. While Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) has demonstrated effectiveness in high-income settings, its high cost and limited adaptability make it less feasible in SSA. The Primary Trauma Care (PTC) course offers a cost-effective and context-appropriate alternative to ATLS. However, its implementation and impact in SSA remain underexplored. This review evaluates the availability, effectiveness, impact, and affordability of PTC courses in SSA. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted across Medline, PubMed, Embase, and African Journals Online to identify studies on PTC training in SSA. Studies examining PTC's impact on injury management, knowledge, skills, patient outcomes, and cost-effectiveness were included. Inclusion criteria focused on studies conducted between 2000 and 2024 in SSA, with a focus on PTC implementation. Results: Four published PTC training studies were identified in both urban and rural settings across SSA, highlighting significant underutilization due to limited funding, infrastructure challenges, and insufficient institutional support. Among 2758 trainees, the majority were nurses (1625, 58.9 %) and clinical officers (1624, 58.8 %), followed by physicians (979, 35.5 %) and medical students (155, 5.6 %). Three studies demonstrated significant improvements in participants' knowledge, confidence, and skills. One study reported a reduction in trauma-related mortality rates. However, only one study directly assessed patient outcomes, indicating a gap in evaluating long-term impacts. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review of PTC training in SSA, offering novel insights into its effectiveness and addressing critical gaps in trauma care research for resource-limited settings. The findings demonstrate that PTC significantly enhances trauma care knowledge, confidence, and departmental capacity, making it a cost-effective and scalable training program for resource-constrained settings. However, the limited scope and frequency of PTC courses call for policymakers to prioritize expanding access to these programs and integrating them into national trauma care strategies. Collaborative efforts are needed to secure funding, increase institutional support, and conduct more institution-based studies to evaluate the long-term impact of PTC on patient outcomes, morbidity, and quality of life in SSA.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».