Correlation between Olink and SomaScan proteomics platforms in adults with a Fontan circulation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
High-throughput proteomics platforms using aptamers (SomaScan) or proximity extension assay (Olink) provide novel opportunities for improving diagnostic and risk stratification tools in cardiovascular diseases, including understudied congenital heart diseases. The correlation between these proteomics approaches has not yet been studied among individuals with a Fontan circulation. The correlation of plasma protein measurements between SomaScan and Olink platforms was evaluated in adults with a Fontan circulation. We measured 491 proteins in plasma of 71 adults with a Fontan circulation using Olink and SomaScan. Missing Olink measurements (0.13%, 47/34,861) were imputed using non-parametric imputation. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for absolute values of protein expression between platforms was calculated. Protein correlation frequencies were compared to 3 cohorts reported in the literature using Pearson's Chi-squared test of independence. Overall, protein correlations between Olink and SomaScan measurements were moderately strong for most proteins, (rho > 0.4 for 57.2%), but with substantial variability (median correlation = 0.457, IQR = 0.538). The distribution of protein correlations was qualitatively similar to published literature in non-Fontan cohorts. Both Olink and SomaScan identified proteins with sex-based differences; both identified differences in myostatin and leptin, but each identified additional nonoverlapping sexually dimorphic proteins (n = 14 Olink, n = 5 SomaScan). In adults with a Fontan circulation, correlations between plasma proteins measured by Olink and SomaScan varied widely, approximately in line with prior reports in other populations. While these tools may be uniquely useful to generate hypotheses, specifically regarding potential molecular mechanisms, more definitive inference requires independent validation. In this study, we performed high throughput plasma proteomics profiling using Olink and SomaScan platforms on a cohort of patients with single ventricle Fontan circulation. Key results for measurement correlations between Olink and SomaScan, a comparison of protein correlation frequency to literature reports, and phenotypic validation of differential expression of sex proteins are summarized. Illustration created via BioRender (BioRender, Toronto, Canada, biorender.com ). Abbreviations: Rho = Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; NHS = Nurses' Health Study [4]; ARIC = Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities [7]; HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing septal ablation [6]. • Plasma proteomics platforms may provide insights into the pathophysiology of the Fontan circulation, a state associated with adverse outcomes and poorly understood mechanisms. • We studied the correlation between the Olink and SomaScan proteomic platforms, describing moderate correlation; the results were qualitatively similar to other reported cohorts of biventricular patients. • This suggests that the validity of these platforms in the Fontan circulation may be similar to that seen in cohorts with biventricular patients. Tweet Summarizing this Article: @CincyChildrens @BostonChildrens @BIDMCHealth researchers have investigated how well high-throughput proteomics @SomaLogic @OlinkProteomics correlate in Fontan patients. These platforms may provide unique opportunities for developing cardiovascular risk stratification models.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».