MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte

Lupus Peripheral Neuropathy Masquerading as Leprosy

2025· article· en· W4409498122 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. F. Giridhar, Pratap Kumar Patra, Puneet Kumar Choudhary, Manoj Kumar, Chandra M. Kumar

Notice bibliographique

RevueNeurology India · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineLeprosyPeripheral neuropathySystemic lupus erythematosusDermatologyPeripheralPathologyInternal medicineDiseaseDiabetes mellitus

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir, A 12-year-old boy presented with progressive clawing of the fingers of the right hand, associated with reduced pain and temperature sensation for the last two years. Later, he developed moderate to high-grade fever over the last 2 months. He was being treated for leprosy with a multi-drug therapy regimen, including dapsone, clofazimine, and rifampicin, elsewhere, but his symptoms continued to worsen. The slit skin smear for Mycobacterium leprae, prior to starting muti-drug therapy (MDT), was negative. Examination revealed severe pallor, alopecia, and a hypopigmented macule over the left cheek with intact sensation. Neurological examination revealed right-hand palmar atrophy and clawing of the fingers [Figure 1a and b]. No peripheral nerve thickening, beading, or tenderness was noted. Weakness of right-sided thumb adduction (positive Froment sign), right abductor digiti minima, flexor digiti minima brevis, opponents digiti minima, and palmar and dorsal interossei was noted. Additionally, the right thumb abduction, flexion, and opposition were weak. The pain and temperature sensation were impaired over the right ulnar nerve innervation, while touch, pressure, and proprioception were intact. Laboratory investigations revealed reduced hemoglobin, normal white cell count, low platelet count, increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and normal C-reactive protein. Peripheral blood smear showed evidence of hemolysis, lactate dehydrogenase level was elevated and direct Coomb’s test was positive. Both C3 and C4 complement levels were low. The anti-nuclear antibody profile was positive for anti-SmD1 and dsDNA antibodies. Nerve conduction study revealed reduced compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude in the right median nerve with increased latency and reduced velocity, an inexcitable right ulnar nerve, reduced CMAP amplitude with increased distal latency and reduced velocity in the right median nerve, and reduced conduction velocity in the bilateral peroneal and left tibial nerves. Minimal latency of the F-waves was prolonged in the right median, bilateral tibial, and bilateral peroneal nerves. The F-wave was not elicitable in the right ulnar nerve. The electrophysiological study was suggestive of asymmetric demyelinating motor neuropathy [Figure 1c].Figure 1: Photograph of the right hand shows atrophy of the thenar and hypothenar muscles muscles and clawing of the fourth and fifth digits (a and b). Nerve conduction study (c) shows reduced CMAP amplitude in the right median nerve with increased latency and reduced velocity, an inexcitable right ulnar nerve, increased distal latency with reduced CMAP amplitude and velocity in the right median nerve, and reduced conduction velocity in bilateral peroneal and left tibial nerves. Minimal latency of the F-waves was prolonged in the right median, bilateral tibial, and bilateral peroneal nerves. The F-wave was not elicitable in the right ulnar nerveThe diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE) with peripheral nerve involvement and hemolytic anemia was made based on the clinical features and laboratory parameters.[1] Multidrug therapy for leprosy was stopped, and he received pulse methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg for 3 days, followed by oral prednisolone. After an ophthalmological evaluation, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was added. He received cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m² for six doses, 4 weeks apart. Rehabilitative measures for the claw hand were initiated, and he is doing well at the last follow-up. The exact incidence of peripheral neuropathy in childhood lupus is unknown. While many reports of leprosy mimicking SLE have been documented, to our knowledge, this is the first report of SLE masquerading as leprosy in children. In one of the largest cohorts from Canada, which included 91 cases of childhood SLE, only 2 patients had peripheral neuropathy.[2] Similarly, in a report from Israel involving a cohort of 35 children, only 4 children had peripheral neuropathy.[3] Differentiating lupus-associated peripheral neuropathy from neurotic leprosy can be challenging. It is necessary to perform a complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, direct Coombs test, antinuclear antibody (ANA) profile, C3 and C4 levels, and antiphospholipid antibodies testing when features such as fever, hematological involvement, or involvement of other systems are present, which cannot be explained by leprosy alone. Additionally, this case highlights that peripheral neuropathy alone may be the presenting feature of lupus, with systemic features appearing much later in the course of the illness. Treatment of peripheral neuropathy in SLE is guided by observational studies due to lack of randomized trials. Glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, plasmapheresis, rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and intravenous immunoglobulin are the commonly used immunosuppressive agents. Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,464
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,748

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,299
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNeurology IndiaMême sujetSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchTravaux en français237 207