MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4409502218 · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1598331

Editorial: Opportunities and challenges of interprofessional collaboration and education, volume II

2025· editorial· en· W4409502218 sur OpenAlexaff
Jill Thistlethwaite, John R. Gilbert, Anthony Breitbach, Ciraj Ali Mohammed, M. Müller-Schilling, Sophie Schlosser‐Hupf

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Medicine · 2025
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVolume (thermodynamics)Interprofessional educationMedical educationEngineering ethicsMedicinePolitical scienceEngineeringHealth carePhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

describes twenty studies and twelve tools, discussing the strengths and weaknesses of each. The paper is a useful resource for educators but highlights the need for a consensus approach to assessment, particularly to support learning effectively.To achieve interprofessional competencies for subsequent health professional practice, relevant learning activities are required. These may be in the formal curriculum, or informal and extracurricular activities developed by the learners themselves. Hirsch et al at the University of Birmingham (UK) studied the impact of an innovative IPE student society, the Knowledge and Skills Exchange (KASE), on participants' subsequent experience as health professionals. 4 Through interviews, the authors identified positive perceptions around themes of interprofessional communication, teamworking, patient-centred care, leadership and organizational skills, confidence and resilience. These findings align with research that early exposure to IPE, relevant to the context of students' lived experience, can have a positive impact on their professional practice including team collaboration, the quality of care provided and job satisfaction, all of which have been shown to contribute to improved health outcomes. 5 6 7 8 9 Formal learning includes interprofessional training wards (IPTW), ie functioning inpatient wards staffed by students working collaboratively under supervision. These wards continue to be evaluated as authentic interprofessional clinical activities. Three papers from Germany focus on IPTWs.Schlosser-Hupf et al 10 looked at the cost-effectiveness of an internal medicine IPTW, an important evaluation as costing health professional education is difficult and rare. 11 The A-STAR IPTW at University Hospital Regensburg was compared to conventional wards. The research analyzed 7,244 patient cases examining economic outcomes and clinical performance. This study demonstrates that IPTWs can be economically viable while providing quality care, even during challenging periods like the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors suggest these findings provide a compelling rationale for broader implementation of such wards as platforms for educating future healthcare professionals.Schwarz et al report on an IPTW in neonatology at a Munich hospital that had a positive impact on IPL and self-assessment of competencies. 12 Emphasising the importance of training in interprofessional facilitation, Müller et al in Freiburg developed and evaluated a faculty development program for medical residents engaging with an IPTW. 13 IPE is thriving in parts of Africa. The African Interprofessional Education Network (AfriPEN) works of the sub-Saharan region hosted its 4 th conference in 2023 on the topic: Are we making a difference in Africa? 14 IPE for the development of an interprofessional identity is being increasingly recognised globally.Reinders et al explore the extended professional identity theory (EPIT) as a framework for fostering interprofessional identities that complement individual professional identities. 16 The authors consider how through integrating interprofessional identity formation with skill development and environmental adaptability, EPIT enhances collaboration in diverse professional settings. The discussion highlights EPIT's potential in Türkiye, particularly in advancing IPE, university engagement, and collaborative strategies while addressing local challenges. IPECP continues to be important for health professionals following qualification. Fleischmann et al.implemented an interprofessional approach to improve medication management for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). 17 The findings of this prospective study demonstrated that integrating pharmaceutical expertise into IBD care significantly improves patient satisfaction, reduces medication-related concerns, and enhances medication safety. The authors advocate for routine medication reviews to optimize therapeutic outcomes and better integrate patient perspectives into clinical practice.The outcomes of IPEC are being researched not only in terms of patient care but also effects on health professional well-being. Ruttmann et al. examined the relationship between interprofessional collaboration and psychological distress among healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic at a German university hospital. 18 The monocentric cross-sectional study was conducted during the initial pandemic wave and involved 299 healthcare professionals. It highlights the vital role of enhanced interprofessional collaboration in strengthening healthcare professionals' psychological well-being during crises. The authors emphasize the need to foster collaborative environments and integrate IPE to help build resilience in healthcare teams. Professional well-being and patient outcomes are also affected by organisational culture. While the survey instrument developed by Rietdijk et al to assess self-perceived open organizational culture was validated in a hospital pharmacy, 19 it has the potential to be employed in interprofessional practice settings.The development and use of applications (apps) for health professional learning on mobile devices are becoming more widespread. Seelandt et al. evaluated the impact of an evidence-based debriefing app on anesthesia team performance. 20 The researchers observed anesthesia teams during two complex inductions, with teams using the Zurich Debriefing App between procedures.This small pilot study indicates that the app enhances anaesthesia team performance, particularly through senior physicians' reflective contributions. The researchers note that the app offers a resource-efficient way to integrate debriefing into clinical practice, potentially improving interprofessional team functioning and patient safety.Opportunities and Challenges of Interprofessional Collaboration and Education II presents diverse perspectives from education and practice. It provides evidence that the interprofessional field is growing in maturity and rigor. Researchers must continue to move from studies that are narrowly defined in single experiences to exploring interventions across multiple contexts, over time and situated in authentic experiences. This will provide added insight into how IPECP impacts all learners throughout the continuum of health professional education and practice in addition to patient/client outcomes.Word count: 1198

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,045

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,037
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0050,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0060,004
Bibliométrie0,0080,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,005
Communication savante0,0120,008
Science ouverte0,0060,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0200,018
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,396
Écart entre enseignants0,372 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in MedicineMême sujetInterprofessional Education and CollaborationTravaux en français237 207