Study on the construction of learners’ emotion perception model and its improvement of behavioral patterns in artificial intelligence-assisted education based on deep learning
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
With the wide application of deep learning in the field of education, student emotion perception has become one of the research hotspots. The study recognizes learners’ facial expressions by face detection algorithm after collecting learners’ data and preprocessing. Algorithms such as convolutional neural network and ConvLSTM are used to recognize learners’ emotions, and learners’ emotions are constructed to be modeled. Evaluate the learner emotion performance of this paper’s model and compare it with other emotion recognition models. The model of this paper is used for practical research to collect students’ emotions in six classes, and statistics and analysis are performed. Finally, by studying the relationship between students’ emotions and behaviors, targeted suggestions for improving students’ behaviors are proposed. The accuracy of this paper’s model in recognizing student emotions on the RAF-DB dataset and classroom dataset is 90.32% and 97.65%, respectively, which is much higher than that of other pre-trained models. The recognition accuracy of this paper’s model for eight types of student emotions is between [0.93, 0.98]. In the statistics of classroom students’ emotions, the main emotions of students in session 1 were concentration, in session 2 were surprise and concentration, in sessions 3, 4, and 6 were surprise and delight, and in session 5 were concentration and disappointment. Focus was significantly positively correlated with “serious attendance”, “thinking”, “answering questions”, “discussing” and “doing tests”, tiredness was significantly positively correlated with “answering questions”, “reviewing” and “deserting”, boredom was significantly positively correlated with “answering questions”, “doing quizzes”, “reviewing” and “desertion”, doubts were significantly positively correlated with “discussing”, “doing quizzes” and “reviewing”, distraction was significantly positively correlated with “reviewing” and “desertion”, happiness was significantly positively correlated with “discussion”, and disappointment was significantly positively correlated with “desertion”.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle