Financial Literacy and Leadership Skills Among Healthcare Professionals in Greece
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Healthcare professionals require comparable knowledge and abilities in hospital financial administration. In addition, many physicians are not equipped to manage the leadership roles that healthcare systems require, namely the capacity to express a vision, convey it to others, garner willing support for it, and enable others to be leaders in return. Previous studies have demonstrated that physicians often lack financial literacy, while a recent systematic review and meta-analysis showed that healthcare professionals lack adequate financial literacy, although top healthcare practitioners and executive nurse leaders are encouraged to develop knowledge and abilities outside of their clinical specialty. The need for medical practitioners to receive training and experience in medical leadership has also been discussed in earlier studies. In Greece, evidence regarding the financial literacy levels and leadership skills among healthcare professionals is lacking, although physicians and nurses are required to obtain managerial and administrative roles as they progress in their positions. Our objective was to assess healthcare professionals’ levels of financial literacy and investigate the relationship between financial literacy and leadership skills in Greece. We conducted a prospective, multi-centered, question-based survey among healthcare professionals in several institutions in Northern Greece. Participants were asked to fill out basic demographic questions, the OECD/INFE Toolkit for Measuring Financial Literacy and Financial Inclusion 2022, and the Leadership Skills questionnaire, translated into Greek. The factorability of the questionnaires was examined with factor analysis, while the internal consistency was examined with Cronbach’s alpha. A linear correlation of leadership scores with financial literacy scores was performed with the Spearman rho, and multivariate regression analysis examined the correlation of the leadership score with financial literacy scores, adjusted for the type of task, education, status, gender, and age. The overall financial literacy score for all healthcare professionals was 69.14 ± 13.25%, which was higher compared to the average for the Greek population. Male healthcare professionals with administrative tasks had significantly higher overall financial literacy and digital financial literacy scores than females, or professionals without administrative tasks, as well as higher scores in all areas of leadership. Physicians had significantly higher overall financial literacy scores than nurses and significantly lower digital financial behavior and digital finance trend scores. Still, physicians scored significantly lower than nurses in all areas of leadership skills. There was a strong correlation between overall financial and digital financial literacy scores with leadership skills scores. Future research is warranted to explore how formal financial and leadership education included in the training programs of healthcare professionals would empower physicians by enabling them to make proactive decisions regarding their financial and managerial destiny.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».