Removable Boot vs Casting of Toddler’s Fractures
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Toddler's fractures (TF) of the tibia are commonly treated with casts and fracture clinic follow-up. However, a prefabricated removable boot might be sufficient and reduce unnecessary follow-up. Objectives: To determine whether pain in children with TF treated with a removable boot is not worse than those managed with a circumferential cast at 4 weeks postinjury. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pragmatic, multicenter, assessor-blinded, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted between October 2019 and February 2024 at 4 urban, tertiary care, pediatric Canadian emergency departments. Children aged between 9 months and 4 years with a radiograph-visible TF were eligible for inclusion. Interventions: Prefabricated walking boot for up to 3 weeks (removable at caregivers' discretion) vs circumferential cast immobilization (site standard of care) for 3 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measure: The primary outcome was pain score, measured with the Evaluation Enfant Douleur (EVENDOL) scale (maximum score: 15). Additional outcomes included return to baseline activities, complications, parental satisfaction and care burden. Results: In 129 enrolled children, the mean (SD) age was 2.2 (0.8) years, and 56 children (43%) were female. Of these, 118 children (92%) completed the 4-week follow-up, and the boot (n = 64) vs cast (n = 54) groups demonstrated mean (SD) EVENDOL pain scores of 1.21 (1.54) and 1.76 (2.13), respectively (difference, -0.55; 95% CI, -1.23 to 0.13). The percentage of participants who returned to baseline activities "almost all of the time" was 49 of 64 children (77%) in the boot group and 22 of 54 (41%) in the cast group (difference, 36%; 95% CI, 9%-63%). Skin complications occurred in both groups (boot: 46 total complications [72%], with 5 stage 1 pressure sores; cast: 27 total complications (50%), with 1 pressure sore]; difference, 22%; 95% CI, -6% to 50%). There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of caregivers who were satisfied or very satisfied with the treatment (difference, 9%; 95% CI, -24% to 43%). Fewer caregivers reported bathing care burden (difference, -32%; 95% CI, -47% to -18%) and challenges with carrying the child (difference, -21%; 95% CI, -27% to -15%) in the boot vs cast group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter randomized clinical trial examining the management of children with TF, a removable boot without physician follow-up was noninferior to circumferential casting with respect to pain recovery. While there was a clinically relevant but not statistically significant trend toward more skin complications in the boot group, there was no difference in caregiver satisfaction, and the boot strategy demonstrated reduced childcare-related challenges. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03971448.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».