Abstract 2500: An automated and scalable pipeline for high-dimensional immune cell phenotyping in mass cytometry datasets
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Context: With the increasing use of spectral flow and mass cytometry technologies, efficient single-cell phenotyping has become essential for the identification of complex cell populations. Traditionally, these populations are identified through manual gating, a time-consuming process that is also subject to variability and a lack of reproducibility. Here, we adapted a deep learning model [1] to devise an automated gating pipeline with the goal of enhancing the accuracy, speed, and reproducibility of immune cell gating. Methods: Our pipeline was evaluated on two mass-cytometry datasets [1], [2] (>5M cells, 35 markers), that had been previously gated by experts for comparison purposes. Phenotypic markers were used for identification, while the median expression of intracellular markers was used to determine the functional properties of populations. Accuracy and F1-score were used to compare classified populations against manually gated populations. A third dataset (15M events from 57 patients diagnosed with lung cancer) was used to compare the prediction of lung cancer progression after immunotherapy using properties based on manually vs. automatically gated populations. Results: The automated gating pipeline achieved high overall accuracy comparable to expert manual gating (n=30 cell populations) (0.917 and 0.921 for dataset 1 and 2, respectively). Processing time was significantly reduced: <12min for both datasets (8CPUs, 8GB of RAM). High-level populations (n=10) were identified with excellent accuracy (e.g. Tcells, Bcells with f1-score of 0.993, 0.937 on the first dataset and 0.996, 0.934 on the second dataset). However, rare populations (n=20) showed higher discrepancies (e.g. intermediate monocytes, DC with f1-scores of 0.864, 0.816 and 0.678, 0.552 on dataset 1 and 2, respectively). Differences in identification scores had low effect on the functional properties of populations, as 91.4% of the functional properties defined from our pipeline were highly correlated (r>0.75) with those derived from manual gating. Further, the prediction of lung cancer progression after immunotherapy showed similar or improved results using functional properties based on automated identified populations (AUC=0.82) compared to manually gated populations (AUC=0.70). Conclusion: This automated approach eliminates operator biases and handles multiple markers simultaneously, offering reliable and efficient analyses for research and clinical applications. To explore discrepancies, future work will incorporate datasets annotated by multiple experts to assess inter-expert variability. 1. Blampey, Q. et al, A biology-driven deep generative model for cell-type annotation in cytometry. Brief Bioinform. 2023 Sep 20;. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad260. 2. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05523713 3. Ina A. Stelzer et al, Sci.Transl.Med.13, (2021). DOI:10.1126/scitranslmed.abd9898 Citation Format: Benjamin Waked, Grégoire Bellan, Xavier Durand, Alexandre Maillard, Franck Verdonk, Brice Gaudilliere, Helen McGuire, Natalie Smith, Christina Loh, David King, Dominique Blanchard, Julien Hedou. An automated and scalable pipeline for high-dimensional immune cell phenotyping in mass cytometry datasets [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2500.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».