The Green Edge of Advanced Technology Drives Sustainable Environmental and Business Growth
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Remote sensing technology has emerged as a vital tool for monitoring and sustainably managing the environment. This paper reviews recent advances in remote sensing and their applications for environmental sustainability. A comprehensive literature review was conducted focusing on high-resolution analysis, temporal change detection, and hyper-spectral monitoring. Applications highlighted include detailed urban habitat mapping, assessing shoreline erosion, tracking forest disturbances, monitoring crop health, detecting pollution, and mapping coral reef degradation. The results showcase the quantitative insights remote sensing provides across diverse sustainability issues like climate change, urban planning, conservation, and disaster response. The paper emphasizes how ongoing improvements in remote sensing are enhancing environmental modelling capabilities and information availability, playing a key role in evidence-based decision-making for sustainable resource management. References Acharya, T.D. and Lee, D.H., 2019. Remote Sensing and Geospatial Technologies for Sustainable Development: A Review of Applications. Sensors & Materials, 31. Avtar, R., Komolafe, A.A., Kouser, A., Singh, D., Yunus, A.P., Dou, J., Kumar, P., Gupta, R.D., Johnson, B.A., Minh, H.V.T. and Aggarwal, A.K., 2020. Assessing sustainable development prospects through remote sensing: A review. Remote sensing applications: Society and environment, 20, p.100402. Asif, D. M., & Shaheen, A. (2022). Creating a High-Performance Workplace by the determination of Importance of Job Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Leadership. Journal of Business Insight and Innovation, 1(2), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.9876/jbii.v1i2.10 Asif, M., Pasha, M. A., Mumtaz, A., & Sabir, B. (2023). Causes of Youth Unemployment in Pakistan. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 41-50. Bibri, S. E., & Bibri, S. E. (2018). Data science for urban sustainability: Data mining and data-analytic thinking in the next wave of city analytics. Smart Sustainable Cities of the Future: The Untapped Potential of Big Data Analytics and Context–Aware Computing for Advancing Sustainability, 189-246. Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017). The core enabling technologies of big data analytics and context-aware computing for smart sustainable cities: a review and synthesis. Journal of Big Data, 4, 1-50. Estoque, R.C., 2020. A review of the sustainability concept and the state of SDG monitoring using remote sensing. Remote Sensing, 12(11), p.1770. Franklin, S.E., 2001. Remote sensing for sustainable forest management. CRC press. Kour, R., Singh, S., Sharma, H.B., Naik, T.S.S.K., Shehata, N., Pavithra, N., Ali, W., Kapoor, D., Dhanjal, D.S., Singh, J. and Khan, A.H., 2023. Persistence and remote sensing of agri-food wastes in the environment: Current state and perspectives. Chemosphere, p.137822. Kouziokas, G.N. and Perakis, K., 2017. Decision support system based on artificial intelligence, GIS and remote sensing for sustainable public and judicial management. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(3), pp.397-397. Lai, Y. (2022). Urban Intelligence for Carbon Neutral Cities: Creating Synergy among Data, Analytics, and Climate Actions. Sustainability, 14(12), 7286. Li, F., Yigitcanlar, T., Nepal, M., Nguyen, K., & Dur, F. (2023). Machine Learning and Remote Sensing Integration for Leveraging Urban Sustainability: A Review and Framework. Sustainable Cities and Society, 104653. Li, J., Pei, Y., Zhao, S., Xiao, R., Sang, X. and Zhang, C., 2020. A review of remote sensing for environmental monitoring in China. Remote Sensing, 12(7), p.1130. Liang, A., Yan, D., Yan, J., Lu, Y., Wang, X. and Wu, W., 2023. A Comprehensive Assessment of Sustainable Development of Urbanization in Hainan Island Using Remote Sensing Products and Statistical Data. Sustainability, 15(2), p.979. Liang, A., Yan, D., Yan, J., Lu, Y., Wang, X., & Wu, W. (2023). A Comprehensive Assessment of Sustainable Development of Urbanization in Hainan Island Using Remote Sensing Products and Statistical Data. Sustainability, 15(2), 979. Pande, C. B., & Moharir, K. N. (2023). Application of hyperspectral remote sensing role in precision farming and sustainable agriculture under climate change: A review. Climate Change Impacts on Natural Resources, Ecosystems and Agricultural Systems, 503-520. Prince, S.D., 2019. Challenges for remote sensing of the Sustainable Development Goal SDG 15.3.1 productivity indicator. Remote Sensing of Environment, 234, p.111428. Rochon, G.L., Johannsen, C.J., Landgrebe, D.A., Engel, B.A., Harbor, J.M., Majumder, S. and Biehl, L.L., 2004. Remote sensing as a tool for achieving and monitoring progress toward sustainability. Technological choices for sustainability, pp.415-428. Seyam, M. M. H., Haque, M. R., & Rahman, M. M. (2023). Identifying the land use land cover (LULC) changes using remote sensing and GIS approach: A case study at Bhaluka in Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 7, 100293. Tékouabou, S. C., Chenal, J., Azmi, R., Toulni, H., Diop, E. B., & Nikiforova, A. (2022). Identifying and Classifying Urban Data Sources for Machine Learning-Based Sustainable Urban Planning and Decision Support Systems Development. Data, 7(12), 170. West, H., Quinn, N., & Horswell, M. (2019). Remote sensing for drought monitoring & impact assessment: Progress, past challenges and future opportunities. Remote Sensing of Environment, 232, 111291. White, J. C., Coops, N. C., Wulder, M. A., Vastaranta, M., Hilker, T., & Tompalski, P. (2016). Remote sensing technologies for enhancing forest inventories: A review. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42(5), 619-641. Xiuwan, C., 2002. Using remote sensing and GIS to analyse land cover change and its impacts on regional sustainable development. International journal of remote sensing, 23(1), pp.107-124. Yang, X.X. ed., 2021. Urban remote sensing: monitoring, synthesis and modeling in the urban environment. John Wiley & Sons. Zhu, L., Suomalainen, J., Liu, J., Hyyppä, J., Kaartinen, H., & Haggren, H. (2018). A review: Remote sensing sensors. Multi-purposeful application of geospatial data, 19-42.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,011 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».