Interaction of brain imaging features and effects of intensive blood pressure lowering after endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: the pre-specified secondary analyses of ENCHANTED2/MT trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<h2>Summary</h2><h3>Background</h3> The second Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombectomy Stroke Study (ENCHANTED2/MT) was terminated early when the intensive blood pressure lowering to a systolic level of 120 mm Hg or lower, compared to 140–180 mm Hg, was harmful in patients who received successful endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion. We aimed to determine the interaction of key brain imaging features and the effect of treatment on clinical outcomes. <h3>Methods</h3> ENCHANTED2/MT was a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial that aimed to assess the effectiveness of different intensities of blood pressure control on the functional independence in patients who had received successful endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke from large-vessel occlusion at 44 hospitals in China between July 20, 2020 and March 7, 2022. In these pre-specified secondary analyses, neuroradiologists reviewed the baseline brain images of participants (computerised tomography [CT], CT with angiography [CTA] and digital subtraction angiography [DSA]) blind to treatment allocation, to determine the degree of cerebral infarction on the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), collateral status according to modified TAN score, and degree of reperfusion on the expanded Treatment In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) scale. The primary outcome was functional independence, according to the distribution of scores on the modified Rankin scale (range 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was done according to the modified intention-to-treat principle in all participants with available outcome data. ENCHANTED2/MT is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04140110. <h3>Findings</h3> Of 816 participants in the trial, in whom 407 were assigned to more intensive blood pressure lowering and 409 were assigned to less intensive blood pressure lowering treatment, there were 533, 372, and 757 participants with available data for ASPECTS, collateral flow, and eTICI analyses, respectively. Intensive blood pressure lowering was associated with worse functional independence in participants with complete reperfusion (eTICI 3: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.51, 95% CI 1.14–2.02) but not in those with incomplete reperfusion (eTICI 2b/c: aOR 1.29, 95% CI 0.73–2.28), without significant interaction (p<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.82). There was no significant interaction between blood pressure treatment and ASPECTS (0–5 vs. 6–10: aOR 1.27, 95% CI 0.77–2.11 vs. aOR 1.37, 95% CI 0.91–2.07; p<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.14) on functional independence. However, more intensive blood pressure lowering treatment was associated with worse functional independence in participants with poor collateral status (aOR 1.99, 95% CI 1.11–3.57) compared to those with good collateral status (aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.53–1.45), with a moderate level of interaction (p<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.037). <h3>Interpretation</h3> Our study indicates that collateral status may help identify patients at risk from intensive blood pressure lowering treatment to a systolic target of 120 mm Hg or lower, in patients undergoing endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke from large-vessel occlusion. <h3>Funding</h3> The Shanghai Hospital Development Center; National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia; Medical Research Foundation (MRF) of the UK; AstraZeneca; China Stroke Prevention; Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality; Takeda China; Hasten Biopharmaceutic; Genesis Medtech; Penumbra.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».