A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Examine the Effectiveness of Exercise Training in People With Osteoporosis or Osteopenia Compared to Other Rehabilitation Interventions on Fear of Falling and the Number of Falls
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fear of falling (FoF) and falls are significant concerns for community-dwelling older adults with osteoporosis or osteopenia, leading to decreased mobility and quality of life. Despite evidence suggesting the benefits of exercise training, its specific effects on the FoF and number of falls (NoF) in this population are not well-documented. This study aims to appraise research evidence on the effects of exercise training, including balance, resistance, and aerobic exercises, on the FoF and NoF in community-dwelling older adults with osteoporosis or osteopenia. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted on scientific databases, including EMBASE, MEDLINE, PEDRO, the Cochrane Library, Psych INFO, CINHAL, and Google Scholar, to identify relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials written in English and focusing on exercise training in older adults with osteoporosis or osteopenia were considered for inclusion in this study. Two independent authors conducted screening and reviewed articles. They extracted pertinent information, including authors' names, publication year, sample characteristics, intervention and comparison groups details, the FoF and NoF outcomes, intervention duration and dosage, and follow-up periods. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB2) for the risk of bias assessment and the GRADE approach to evaluate the quality of evidence for each outcome. We calculated standardized mean difference, Incidence Rate Ratio, and 95% confidence intervals for the quantitative synthesis of the FoF and NoF. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We included 14 randomized controlled trials (8 for FoF, 5 for the NoF, and 1 with both outcomes) with 2797 participants. All studies but one (with some risk) had a high risk of bias. The primary sources of bias in the included studies were the measurement of outcomes and selective reporting of results. Meta-analyses demonstrated that exercise training including balance, resistance, and aerobic exercises reduced FoF measured using the Fall Efficacy Scale International (overall effect size: -2.15, 95% CI = -3.16 to -1.15, Z = -4.2, P = .001, and I 2 = 0.97) and NoF (IRR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.78, Z = 2.79, P = .012, and I 2 = 96%) significantly. Exercise training may effectively reduce the FoF and fall incidence in patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia. However, the considerable variability, high risk of bias, and methodological limitations in most studies underscored the critical need for high-quality studies to inform evidence-based guidelines, optimize intervention protocols, and establish these programs' long-term effects and sustainability. CONCLUSION: Our study highlighted that exercise training including balance, resistance, and aerobic exercises can significantly decrease the FoF and NoF in older adults with osteoporosis or osteopenia. This issue supports the inclusion of tailored exercise prescriptions within fall prevention strategies for this group. Future research should aim to standardize these exercise interventions to enhance their effectiveness.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,008 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle