A Scoping Review of the Experiences of Internationally Educated Nurses Working With Older Adults in High‐Income Countries
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
AIM: To comprehensively review the experiences and support needs of internationally educated nurses in healthcare settings for older people, identify current supportive interventions for internationally educated nurses in gerontological nursing practice and determine research gaps in the existing literature on their experiences and support needs. The review includes all types of nurses, except those focusing solely on undergraduate nurses who have yet to practise and nursing assistants. METHODS: A scoping review by a Canadian review group followed the methodological framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and later refined by Levac, Colquhoun, and O'Brien (2010). Articles of any publication date were included. A two-stage screening process was conducted independently to determine eligibility. Data extraction was performed using a piloted charting form. We also conducted a consultative exercise with Canadian nurses. Thematic and descriptive analyses were employed to analyse the extracted data. DATA SOURCES: Seven databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, PsychArticles, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and EThOS) were systematically searched on April 27, 2024. Grey literature was searched using Google search engines, OpenGrey, ProQuest Sociological Abstracts and ProQuest ERIC, Healthcare Management Information Consortium, Open Grey repository, Proceedings First, Canada Health and Council for Allied Health Professions Research, and through expert consultation. RESULTS: The scoping review identified 11 articles from Canada, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom, highlighting positive experiences and challenges internationally educated nurses face in healthcare settings for older people. Nurses were primarily registered nurses. Challenges included workplace interpersonal issues, language barriers and organisational constraints, while positive experiences included being valued by older adults and colleagues. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the need for supportive interventions like mentorship, cultural competency training and organisation-led initiatives to improve internationally educated nurses' integration and retention in geriatric care, enhancing care quality for older persons. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Enhancing mentorship programs, cultural competency training, and organization-led support initiatives can improve the integration, retention, and overall well-being of internationally educated nurses in geriatric care, ultimately enhancing the quality of care for older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: osf.io/cwjem.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».