A Virtual Reality–Based Cognitive Defusion Application for Youth Depression and Anxiety: Mixed Methods Experimental Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Third-wave psychological treatments such as acceptance and commitment therapy can be effective for improving depression and anxiety in youth. However, third-wave therapeutic techniques such as cognitive defusion can be abstract, challenging to learn, and difficult to apply in real-world settings. Translating these techniques into virtual reality (VR) may provide interactive, enjoyable, and concrete learning opportunities, potentially enhancing engagement and effectiveness. This study evaluated a novel VR application that translates the technique of cognitive defusion into a brief, gamified VR experience. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, usability, and safety of the VR cognitive defusion application; examine whether it could improve negative thinking and mood states; and understand how it compared to a non-VR cognitive defusion exercise. METHODS: In a mixed methods experimental study, 20 young people completed both a VR and audio cognitive defusion exercise in a randomized order within a single session. Quantitative state-based measures were taken before and after each exercise, and a qualitative interview at the end focused on how the two experiences compared. RESULTS: It was feasible to recruit participants, and all participants completed both exercises and assessments. Both the VR and audio exercises were acceptable to participants, with qualitative themes highlighting a preference for VR due to the novel and engaging format; however, there was a need for better guidance and more personalized environments. No severe adverse events were reported, although one participant experienced distress during the VR exercise. Pretest-posttest effects showed improvements in thought discomfort, cognitive defusion, and state anger for both the VR and audio conditions (P<.05), with the latter showing broader improvements, including thought negativity, rumination, tension, depression, distress, and confusion (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The VR cognitive defusion application was feasible, safe, and acceptable for young people, with potential to enhance mental health treatment through an engaging and enjoyable approach to learning third-wave cognitive behavioral therapy techniques. While VR was preferred by participants, further refinements could improve effectiveness. Future research should focus on enhancing the VR application design based on user feedback, incorporating audio guidance, and conducting a larger trial in real-world settings to thoroughly evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of the VR application.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».