Diagnostic Assessment Considering Complex Damage to FireDamaged Structures
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Generally, building fires cause direct damage to human lives and property, and can also result in indirect damage due to the absence of residential and work spaces during the recovery process.Various preliminary studies have been conducted to minimize the direct damage caused by building fires, resulting in the improvement of design methods, enhancement of material performance, and legal supplements that are being applied in construction sites.Furthermore, minimizing indirect damage can be achieved by applying appropriate recovery measures through rational and prompt diagnostic procedures.However, research on rapid and rational diagnostic procedures for damage recovery has been relatively insufficient.Building fires cause phenomena such as deformation, cracking, spalling, accelerated carbonation, deterioration of material performance, and reduction in residual strength of structural members, leading to complex damage rather than damage by a single factor.Therefore, the diagnostic process of fire-damaged buildings requires a thorough investigation of the damage scale by setting all chemical and physical phenomena occurring in fire-exposed structures as evaluation items, and deriving diagnostic results based on the investigation content.However, existing diagnostic methods for fire-damaged buildings cannot combine the damage of all evaluation items such as deformation, spalling, cracking, carbonation, and heating temperature.It can only present damage grades for each item, making it impossible to derive a rational diagnostic result for fire-damaged buildings.Additionally, the method of estimating heating temperature, which is the most crucial factor in diagnosing fire-damaged buildings, has limitations.It involves visual assessment of concrete discoloration, deformation or melting states of finishing materials, along with various non-destructive testing methods that can yield results significantly different from the actual heating temperature.Estimation results of heating temperatures with large deviations from the actual fire temperature can lead to entirely different evaluations of the fire damage scale.Different results depending on the diagnostician can significantly expand the damage scale.Therefore, this study aims to propose a rational diagnostic method that overcomes the problems of existing diagnostic methods by minimizing the empirical judgment process of evaluators and performing diagnostics by comprehensively assessing the complex damage items caused by fire.Additionally, to ensure consistent diagnostic results, even when different evaluators perform diagnostics on fire-damaged buildings using the proposed method, the study aims to secure reliability through rational case studies and verification processes for each evaluation item.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».