Abstract CT073: A first-in-human study of oral TNO155 (batoprotafib) alone and in combination with EGF816 (nazartinib) in adult patients with advanced solid tumors
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: TNO155 (batoprotafib), a selective, allosteric, oral inhibitor of SHP2, showed anti-tumor efficacy in preclinical cancer models. SHP2 transduces signals from activated receptor tyrosine kinases to downstream pathways including MAPK. EGF816 (nazartinib), an EGFR inhibitor, targets specific mutations in the EGFR gene commonly found in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present results from the first-in-human study of TNO155 single agent (SA), and in combination with nazartinib, in adult patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: CTNO155X2101 (NCT03114319) is an ongoing, dose escalation/expansion (ESC/EXP) trial consisting of two arms: A) TNO155 SA and B) TNO155 with nazartinib. Primary objective is to assess safety and identify dosing regimen(s) for future study. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy. Arm A included pts with advanced solid tumors in ESC and pts with advanced RAS/BRAF WT solid malignancies (Group 1), KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC (Group 2), and NRAS/BRAF WT cutaneous melanoma (Group 3) in EXP; Arm B included pts with advanced NSCLC with an EGFR TKI-sensitizing mutation. Arm B EXP required progression on osimertinib as the most recent prior therapy. Results: As of 1-Aug-2024, 227 pts were treated (Arm A: ESC; n=141; EXP; n=42; Arm B; ESC; n=29; EXP; n=15), and 224 (98.6%) pts had discontinued study treatment, mainly due to progressive disease. Arm A ESC cohorts were previously reported (Brana et al. 2021). The recommended dose for expansion (RDE) was declared as 60 mg QD 2 weeks on/1 week off (2/1). Arm B ESC pts were treated with TNO155 20-60 mg QD 2/1 with nazartinib 100-150 mg QD continuous (cont). The RDE was declared as TNO155 40 mg QD 2/1 plus nazartinib 100 mg QD cont. Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 2 pts, both on TNO155 60 mg QD 2/1 + nazartinib 100 mg QD cont (grade 4 decreased platelet count and grade 3 diarrhea). At the corresponding RDEs, the most common adverse events (>30%), regardless of relationship, reported in Arm A pts (n=55) were peripheral edema and anemia, and in Arm B pts (n=22) were diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, peripheral edema, anemia, and increased creatine phosphokinase.Plasma concentrations on day 14 of TNO155 and nazartinib administered in combination were within the range observed when administered at the same doses as SAs. Best overall response per RECIST v1.1 in Arm A EXP was stable disease (SD) in 5/15 pts (33%) in group 1, 1/12 pts (8.3%) in group 2, and 7/15 pts (46.7%) in group 3 and in Arm B EXP was SD in 3/15 pts (20%). Median duration of SD was 4.4 months in Arm A EXP, and 5.5 months in Arm B EXP.At the RDEs a reduction in tumor DUSP6 expression of >50% from baseline was observed in 9/12 pts in Arm A, and in 2/2 pts in Arm B. Conclusions: TNO155 shows acceptable safety as a SA and with nazartinib and demonstrates evidence of MAPK pathway suppression in tumors. Citation Format: Chia-Chi Lin, Helena Yu, Dong-Wan Kim, Daniel Tan, Dae Ho Lee, Maria Jove Casulleras, N Steeghs, Fredericus Eskens, Ahmad A. Tarhini, Melissa Johnson, Irene Brana, Giuseppe Curigliano, Lillian Siu, Aitana Calvo Ferrandiz, Geoffrey Shapiro, Victor Moreno Garcia, Hironobu Minami, Martin Klumpp, Helen Evans, Thomas Hengelage, Suresh B. Lakshminarayana, John Ritz, Xin Yang, David Kodack, Christopher Straub, Pruthvi Desireddy, Susan Moody, Pilar Garrido. A first-in-human study of oral TNO155 (batoprotafib) alone and in combination with EGF816 (nazartinib) in adult patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT073.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».