Effectiveness of alternative exercises in cardiac rehabilitation for program completion and outcomes in women with or at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative exercises within a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program compared to traditional gym-based exercises or usual care. The focus was on CR completion and outcomes in women. INTRODUCTION: CR programs generally offer traditional gym-based exercises, including treadmill exercises, cycling on ergometers, and conventional resistance training. However, these exercises may not be suitable for all individuals, particularly women with chronic musculoskeletal conditions. Alternative exercises, such as yoga, Pilates, tai chi, Nordic walking, and dancing, have been suggested as safer and more enjoyable options, potentially increasing CR completion rates among women. However, the evidence on the effectiveness of alternative exercises for improving CR completion and other health outcomes for women remains limited. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This systematic review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of alternative exercises in a CR program that recruited at least 50% women participants. Studies were eligible if they included women aged 18 years and over, diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or at high risk of CVD, and participating in an exercise-based CR program. Exercise-based CR programs were defined as interventions for secondary prevention of CVD or for reducing CVD risk in high-risk patients. Alternative exercises could be supervised or unsupervised exercises other than traditional gym-based exercises. Eligible comparators included gym-based exercises, exercise education only, or usual care. The primary outcome was CR completion. METHODS: The following databases were searched from inception to January 15, 2024: MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, and PsycINFO (Ovid). At least 2 reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, and full texts for inclusion. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality and certainty of evidence of included studies using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), respectively. Meta-analyses with random-effects models were conducted for data synthesis. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were included involving 398 women. Alternative exercises (yoga, tai chi, stepping exercises, Nordic walking, outdoor walking, and aerobic dance) had little to no effect on women's CR completion compared to usual care (risk ratio [RR] 1.02; 95%CI 0.87 to 1.20; 2 trials; 51 participants; I2 =0%, very low certainty of evidence). These alternative exercises may result in improved systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, body weight, and 6-minute walk test at ≤12 weeks follow-up. Alternative exercises had little to no effect on other health outcomes, including body mass index, lipid profiles, fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, peak oxygen uptake, quality of life, and depression symptoms at ≤12 weeks. When examining longer-term impacts, it appears offering these modalities had little to no effect on blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) at 24 weeks. The evidence supporting these findings was rated as very low certainty for each outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the effects of alternative exercises within CR on women's CR completion and health outcomes remains limited. This is primarily due to the small number of trials involving women and the very low certainty of evidence for each outcome. Future well-designed RCTs are needed to provide more robust findings. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022354996.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,017 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».