International legal regulation of the liability of an air carrier for a passenger’s checked baggage
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The development of budget airlines has greatly changed the image of travelers, who no longer need to carry multiple suitcases. The decline in airfare prices has been accompanied by a shift to more minimalist travel. But baggage does not disappear from the contract of carriage. The International Air Telecommunications Company (hereinafter referred to as SITA) has highlighted in a statistical study that airlines lost 36.1 million pieces of baggage in 2023, of which 25 million were lost at European airports. The losses are estimated at 2.5 billion euros. The issues of transportation, storage and security of baggage are regulated by international legal mechanisms, the main sources of which are the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air of 28 May 1999. (hereinafter referred to as the Montreal Convention), implemented in Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 (as amended by Regulation (EC) No 889/2002) and in the national legislation of the EU Member States. In the field of air passenger transport, two types of baggage are distinguished: checked baggage (delivered by the airline to the baggage hold) and hand baggage (carried on board with the passenger). This division of baggage was first normatively defined by the provisions of the Warsaw Convention of 1929 for the unification of certain rules relating to international carriage by air of 1929 (hereinafter referred to as the Warsaw Convention). The Montreal Convention accepts this dichotomy, which leads to two different liability regimes. Regulation 881/2002 amending Regulation 2027/97 on air carrier liability in the event of accidents provides in Article 3 §1 that the liability of air carriers for passengers and their baggage shall be governed by all the provisions of the Montreal Convention relating to such liability. The International Air Transport Association (hereinafter referred to as IATA) has developed a Passenger Handling Manual which contains resolutions and recommended practices for the handling of baggage, such as the requirement to indicate the cost of additional services. These resolutions are binding on IATA member airlines. The International Civil Aviation Organization (hereinafter referred to as ICAO) has established a list of dangerous goods, which is contained in Annex 18 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (1944 Chicago Convention) and in the Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air. IATA has also developed rules for the Dangerous Goods Code, which aims to transform ICAO rules into practical guidance for airline procedures. All of these rules are contained in the General Conditions of Carriage, which are used by all air carriers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,016 | 0,012 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».