Predicting Transvaginal Surgical Mesh Exposure Outcomes Using an Integrated Dataset of Blood Cytokine Levels and Medical Record Data: Machine Learning Approach
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Transvaginal insertion of polypropylene mesh was extensively used in surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) due to its cost-efficiency and durability. However, studies have reported a high rate of complications, including mesh exposure through the vaginal wall. Developing predictive models via supervised machine learning holds promise in identifying risk factors associated with such complications, thereby facilitating better informed surgical decisions. Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of anticipating medical outcomes by employing supervised machine learning approaches that integrate patient health care data with laboratory findings. However, such an approach has not been adopted within the realm of POP mesh surgery. Objective: We examined the efficacy of supervised machine learning to predict mesh exposure following transvaginal POP surgery using 3 different datasets: (1) patient medical record data, (2) biomaterial-induced blood cytokine levels, and (3) the integration of both. Methods: Blood samples and medical record data were collected from 20 female patients who had prior surgical intervention for POP using transvaginal polypropylene mesh. Of these subjects, 10 had experienced mesh exposure through the vaginal wall following surgery, and 10 had not. Standardized medical record data, including vital signs, previous diagnoses, and social history, were acquired from patient records. In addition, cytokine levels in patient blood samples incubated with sterile polypropylene mesh were measured via multiplex assay. Datasets were created with patient medical record data alone, blood cytokine levels alone, and the integration of both data. The data were split into 70% and 30% for training and testing sets, respectively, for machine learning models that predicted the presence or absence of postsurgical mesh exposure. Results: Upon training the models with patient medical record data, systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and a history of alcohol usage emerged as the most significant factors for predicting mesh exposure. Conversely, when the models were trained solely on blood cytokine levels, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-12 p40 stood out as the most influential cytokines in predicting mesh exposure. Using the combined dataset, new factors emerged as the primary predictors of mesh exposure: IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, and the presence of hemorrhoids. Remarkably, models trained on the integrated dataset demonstrated superior predictive capabilities with a prediction accuracy as high as 94%, surpassing the predictive performance of individual datasets. Conclusions: Supervised machine learning models demonstrated improved prediction accuracy when trained using a composite dataset that combined patient medical record data and biomaterial-induced blood cytokine levels, surpassing the performance of models trained with either dataset in isolation. This result underscores the advantage of integrating health care data with blood biomarkers, presenting a promising avenue for predicting surgical outcomes in not only POP mesh procedures but also other surgeries involving biomaterials. Such an approach has the potential to enhance informed decision-making for both patients and surgeons, ultimately elevating the standard of patient care.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».