Inflammatory Markers and Invasive Bacterial Infection in Febrile Infants With Positive Urinalyses
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) clinical practice guideline (CPG) for febrile infants provides varying management recommendations for infants with positive urinalyses (UAs) depending on age and the presence of normal vs abnormal inflammatory markers (IMs).1 In a large prospective study conducted at children’s hospital emergency departments (EDs), infants with positive UAs and normal procalcitonin (PCT) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) had a low prevalence of bacteremia and bacterial meningitis.2 However, there are limited studies in non–children’s hospital EDs or when using the AAP recommended combination of IMs when PCT is not available: maximum temperature (Tmax), ANC, and C-reactive protein (CRP).1 We aimed to describe the age-based prevalence of bacteremia and bacterial meningitis in febrile infants aged 8 to 60 days with positive UAs and normal vs abnormal IMs in a large, diverse sample of EDs.We conducted a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of well-appearing, previously healthy infants aged 8 to 60 days with temperatures greater than or equal to 38.0 °C between November 1, 2020, and October 31, 2022, from the Reducing Excessive Variability in Infant Sepsis Evaluation II (REVISE II) data set.3 The study included 33 freestanding children’s hospitals, 37 nonfreestanding children’s hospitals, and 35 general hospitals located in the United States and Canada.Our study was limited to infants with positive UAs, defined as positive leukocyte esterase, presence of nitrites, or greater than 5 white blood cells per high-powered field on microscopy.1,4 We defined bacteremia and bacterial meningitis as the presence of an identified pathogen in blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures, respectively, in infants who received a course of treatment. For IMs, the data collection form listed the normal and abnormal values per the AAP CPG. IMs were considered normal at the following thresholds: PCT less than or equal to 0.5 ng/mL, ANC less than or equal to 4000/mm3, CRP less than 20 mg/L (2 mg/dL), and Tmax less than 38.6 °C.1 We calculated the prevalence of bacteremia and bacterial meningitis among infants with positive UAs, comparing those with normal vs abnormal IMs, overall and stratified by age group, using the AAP CPG recommended combinations: PCT+ANC and Tmax+ANC+CRP. Infants were required to have all IMs in the combination. We used Stata version 18.0 (StataCorp, Inc) for the analyses. The study was deemed exempt by the AAP Institutional Review Board.Of 2144 infants with positive UAs, 135 (6.3%) had bacteremia without meningitis and 12 (0.6%) had meningitis. The prevalence of bacteremia was low in infants with positive UAs and normal IMs (0.3% for both PCT+ANC and Tmax+ANC+CRP) (Table 1). Only 1 infant with normal IMs had bacterial meningitis, across age groups and IM combinations. This 34-day-old infant had a normal PCT and ANC but an abnormal CRP and no bacteremia, and was admitted at the index visit (Table 2). Conversely, the prevalence of bacteremia was high in infants with positive UAs and abnormal IMs, highest in infants aged 8 to 28 days (Table 3), and varied by which IM was abnormal (Supplemental Table 1). The prevalence of bacterial meningitis in infants with abnormal IMs varied by age group, lowest in infants aged 29 to 60 days (0.3%–0.5%) (Table 3).In a multicenter cohort study, we found a low prevalence of bacteremia and bacterial meningitis in febrile infants aged 8 to 60 days with positive UAs and normal IMs. Findings support the AAP CPG recommendations that CSF testing is not needed in most febrile infants with positive UAs and normal IMs and that infants aged 29 to 60 days can be managed as outpatients.1 Additionally, the low prevalence of bacteremia and meningitis in infants aged 8 to 21 days with normal IMs may support shared decision-making about CSF testing in this youngest age group. Although one 34-day-old infant with normal PCT+ANC had meningitis, the infant was admitted at the index visit, raising the question of whether the infant was ill-appearing.Infants with positive UAs and abnormal IMs had a high prevalence of bacteremia, particularly infants aged 8 to 28 days, with some variation by which IM was abnormal. The prevalence of meningitis in infants with abnormal IMs was low though nonzero in infants aged 29 to 60 days. Aligning with the AAP CPG, clinicians can consider shared decision-making about CSF testing for these older infants with positive UAs and abnormal IMs.1Our study builds on prior work by including a large sample of infants evaluated at both children’s and non–children’s hospitals and by assessing the AAP CPG recommended IM combinations. Limitations include the retrospective design, which may have resulted in misclassifying the clinical appearance of febrile infants. Additionally, we used the AAP CPG IM cutoff values, but not those derived more recently.5The authors acknowledge all the sites and site team members that collected data for this study as part of the AAP REVISE II QI Collaborative.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».