In memory of Dr Emily Jutkiewicz, 1975–2024
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We had just concluded an editor’s meeting of Behavioural Pharmacology where she was uncharacteristically absent, when we were shocked by the news of Emily Jutkiewicz passing in September 2024. Emily had been Associate Editor of Behavioural Pharmacology since 2021, being primarily responsible for manuscripts from the USA and Canada. Emily obtained her BSc degree in 1997 from Tufts University. As one of Klaus Miczek’s students, it is no wonder she developed a fascination for behavioural pharmacology, a specialty she further developed under the guidance of Jack Bergman at McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School. With Jack’s unwavering support, she rapidly developed an interest in opioid pharmacology and drug addiction, fields of research she stayed true to until her untimely death. In 1999, she moved to the University of Michigan to pursue a PhD. With her strong interest in opioids and addiction, it was no surprise she entered the lab of James Woods, a world-renowned expert in both areas of research. Professor Woods’ laboratory has been a training ground for numerous leaders in behavioural pharmacology and it was no different with Emily. By the time she obtained her PhD, she was among those who were basically running the Woods laboratory on a day-to-day basis. And, when others moved on as postdocs or as young faculty to start their own research enterprises, Emily decided to put her roots down in Michigan, continuing to manage the Woods laboratory and, at the same time, advancing her very own burgeoning program. This was not an easy course to follow but it quickly became clear that Emily’s intelligence, sense of humour, and genuine kindness were a winning combination—for her students, for Michigan’s Department of Pharmacology, and for the field of behavioural pharmacology at large. Her meticulous time management coupled with her immense scientific curiosity and creativity made her the obvious choice for a faculty position in 2012, and 10 years later, she was named Associate Chair for education at the University of Michigan. Throughout her tenure at the University of Michigan, Emily was a wonderful mentor for her students, supervising close to 30 postgraduate and hundreds of undergraduate students. For her outstanding work in this area, she was awarded the Master’s Mentoring Award from the University of Michigan Rackham Graduate School. Most recently, she was appointed honorary Chair, the Pfizer/Upjohn Research Professor of Translational Pharmacology, a position she was supposed to be inaugurated to in November of 2024. Emily’s research showcased the value of multidisciplinary research, often combining behavioural pharmacology with molecular biology. Her focus was on opioid pharmacology but her research went far beyond opioid drug addiction and addressed many other facets of opioid biology, especially the utility of delta opioids as (potential) medications for pain and depression, as well as their propensity for inducing side effects. One important aspect of Emily’s work was to show that different intracellular pathways underlie the analgesic and convulsive effects of delta opioids, thus paving the way for the discovery of safer analgesic drugs. Emily joined Behavioural Pharmacology as Associate Editor in 2021 when she took over the role from her mentor Jack Bergman. During her tenure as Editor, she was diligent and conscientiously worked hard to ensure the high quality of behavioural pharmacology research reports from North America published in Behavioural Pharmacology, and by extension the quality of the research itself. When associate editor Paul Willner passed away in October 2023 and, a short time later, Louk Vanderschuren stepped down as Editor-in-Chief, Emily was unwavering in her support for the journal. It is largely thanks to her that the new editorial team could take over in a reasonably effortless manner. During our editorial meetings, Emily was always very active with great ideas about the future direction of the journal. Her laughter and her optimism will be sorely missed by all who knew her, but most directly by her husband David, her sons Jack and Sam, and the rest of her family. Acknowledgements Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».