Growth after pediatric and neonatal acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs commonly in critically ill children. The impact of AKI on pediatric growth outcomes has been sparsely described. OBJECTIVE: To compare growth in children with a history of AKI compared to those without AKI. We hypothesized that children with AKI would have worse growth compared to those without AKI. DATA SOURCES: A convenience sample of existing prospective and retrospective cohorts of children with AKI who had already collected or were able to collect data on growth parameters before and after an episode of AKI. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: There are < 5 studies in the published literature on growth in children with AKI. These investigators were contacted, and additional studies were added by contacting primary investigators of studies of childhood AKI in which data on growth parameters was able to be collected. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Children from existing cohorts evaluating AKI (exposure) during childhood. Each included cohort had previously received local IRB approval per institutional guidelines. As our study was a meta-analysis and only used cohort-level data, no IRB approval was required for this report. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: statistic was used to define variability due to between-cohort heterogeneity. RESULTS: We included 3,586 children from 17 existing cohorts of AKI in various populations, including infants, children with cardiac disease, solid organ transplant and critically ill children without cardiac disease with follow-up from 12 months to 11 years after AKI. At most distant follow-up, those with AKI had lower length z-score than those without AKI (mean difference -0.37 [95%CI -0.52, -0.22, p < 0.001]) and lower weight z-score (mean difference of -0.29 [95%CI -0.43, -0.15, p < 0.001]). This difference was most striking in infants, as those with AKI had impaired growth (both length z-score and weight z-score) after AKI compared to those without AKI. LIMITATIONS: The analysis included only a convenience sample of observational cohorts of children, study selection could have been biased, and we did not evaluate the relationship between decreased kidney function (e.g., chronic kidney disease) after AKI in these cohorts and its relationship to poor growth. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: This meta-analysis found that children with AKI have impaired growth after AKI. These findings were most striking in infants. We suggest focusing on growth outcomes in both clinical care and research investigating the impacts of AKI. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: NA.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,015 | 0,028 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,011 | 0,053 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».