Deciphering the Lung Microbiome During Pulmonary Exacerbations and Clinical Stability in Bronchiectasis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Bronchiectasis is characterized by cycles of inflammation and chronic infection. Pulmonary exacerbations are defined by periods of worsening symptoms and dropping lung function. Traditional dogma suggests this is due to overgrowth of canonical bacterial pathogens; however recent studies have shown this to not fully represent all events. The cause(s) of exacerbations are currently unknown, representing a knowledge gap. The central hypothesis of this research project is different endotypes exist in bronchiectasis, are unique to the individual, and can be used for future applications to delineate appropriate clinical therapy. Methodology: Unique at the University of Calgary, we maintain a prospectively collected sputum from all patients, including those with bronchiectasis, who submitted samples from 1980 to present (>20,000 sputum samples and associated metadata). In this study, we sought to identify sputum samples at periods of clinical stability and acute exacerbation within our retrospective cohort. Long-read DNA sequencing was performed using the MinION (Oxford Nanopore). For alpha-diversity analyses, rarefaction curves and diversity indices of observed species richness Chao1, and Shannon were measured followed by Kruskal-Wallis test (p-value < = 0.05). For Beta-Diversity analysis and to visualize overall community structure PCoA plots based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities are generated and PERMANOVA to measure differences between the microbial community profiles. Preliminary Findings: Our preliminary data evaluates 162 samples from 69 patients at different timepoints. Interim analysis demonstrates that the majority (13/16, 81%) had no clear etiology and was deemed idiopathic. Sequencing data demonstrated majority of microbes were classified as expected pathogens within bronchiectasis including Pseudomonas followed by Staphylococcus and Escherichia. Anaerobic genera were present including Prevotella, Gemella and Veillonella. Not surprisingly, we observed varying degree of inter and intra patient variability and heterogeneity with some patients demonstrating relative stability during altered clinical periods and others showing considerable temporal variation. The constrained coordination plot reveals dissimilarities between the community composition at species level and stronger effect of constraint (different time points) on the ordination. No significant changes in the alpha diversity were observed in any of the timepoints across all subjects and PERMANOVA analysis did not reveal any community-wide differences (p=0.20). Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggests cohorts of patients with bronchiectasis that experience temporal change during periods of exacerbations, whereas others do not. This suggests endotypes exist and may be used to personalize therapeutic approaches. Expansion into our cohort across more subjects will be required as next steps to validate our initial findings and delineate clinical associations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».