'Before Medically Advised’ Discharges Following Hospitalization for Asthma Exacerbation: Disparities in Treatment and Outcomes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract INTRODUCTION Before medically advised (BMA) discharges – alternatively known as ‘against medical advice'—are associated with poor outcomes such as increased readmission among patients with asthma. However, it is unclear what factors contribute to these worsened outcomes or what care these patients receive upon discharge. In this study, we evaluated patterns of post-discharge care (i.e. medication prescriptions, referrals, and follow-up) after hospitalizations for asthma exacerbation among patients discharging BMA versus non-BMA. METHODS We developed a cohort using electronic health record data of patients ≥ 18 years old within the Johns Hopkins Health System who had an admission for asthma exacerbation, as defined by ICD-10 codes, and were discharged to home. All admissions were classified as either a BMA or planned (i.e. non-BMA) discharge according to their discharge disposition. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and 30-day readmission were compared between BMA and non-BMA discharges using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. We then evaluated the proportion of discharges in which the patient received each of the following at discharge: an oral steroid prescription, inhaled corticosteroid prescription, outpatient referral for any service, or scheduled follow-up with a primary care physician or pulmonologist within 14-days. Differences in each component of discharge care were compared using logistic regression models with clustered standard errors, adjusted for age, race, sex, length of stay, history of exacerbation, insurance, time of discharge, and medical center. RESULTS This cohort included 5,507 admissions for asthma exacerbation, of which 205 (3.7%) resulted in a BMA discharge. Compared to non-BMA discharges, those discharged BMA were younger (39 vs 48 years, p<0.001) with a higher area deprivation index (67 vs 50, p<0.001). Readmission at 30 days more commonly occurred after a BMA discharge (15 vs 10%, p=0.03). Compared to non-BMA discharges, those who discharged BMA were less likely to receive an oral steroid prescription (54% vs 76%, p<0.001 ), inhaled corticosteroid prescription (32% vs 49%, p<0.001), outpatient referral (9% vs 34%, p<0.001), or scheduled 14-day follow-up (19% vs 27%, p=0.01) (Figure 1). All results were similar in adjusted models, and patients discharging BMA were particularly less likely to receive an outpatient prescription for oral steroids (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.18-0.35) CONCLUSIONS Compared to non-BMA discharges, patients discharged BMA following hospitalization for an asthma exacerbation were less likely to receive outpatient steroids, inhaled corticosteroids, referrals, or follow-up, and they more likely to be readmitted at 30 days. These treatment gaps present potential opportunities to improve care.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».