MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4410286322 · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2025.101013

Systematic review and meta-analysis of microbiota-gut-astrocyte axis perturbation in neurodegeneration, brain injury, and mood disorders

2025· review· en· W4410286322 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueBrain Behavior & Immunity - Health · 2025
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGut microbiota and health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeUK Research and InnovationCanadian Fertility and Andrology Society
Mots-clésAstrocyteNeurodegenerationNeuroscienceMood disordersGut–brain axisMoodGut floraMeta-analysisMedicinePsychologyPsychiatryInternal medicineImmunologyCentral nervous systemAnxietyDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Astrocytes are essential for preserving homeostasis, maintaining the blood-brain barrier, and they are a key element of the tripartite neuronal synapse. Despite such multifaceted roles, their importance as contributors to the microbiota-gut-brain axis studies, which typically focus on microglia and neurons, has been largely overlooked. This meta-analysis provides the first systematic review of the microbiota-gut-astrocyte (MGA) axis in vivo, integrating findings across distinct neurological diseases. A systematic narrative review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. The search term employed for PubMed was "Microbiota"[MeSH] AND (astrocyte OR glial) NOT (Review[Publication Type]) and for Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus, “Microbio* AND (astrocyte OR glial)” with filters applied to exclude review articles. Searches were completed by May 9 th 2024. Data extracted included study models, interventions, and outcomes related to astrocyte biology and rodent behaviour. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool was used to assess individual study designs. 53 studies met the inclusion criteria, covering rodent models of stroke and traumatic (acute) brain injury, chronic neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease and other heterogeneous models of cognitive impairment and affective disorders. Significant heterogeneity in methodology was observed between studies. Five studies had a high risk of bias, and 15 were low risk. Astrocyte biology, typically measured by GFAP expression, was increased in neurodegeneration and acute brain injury models but varied significantly in mood disorder models, depending on the source of stress. Common findings across diseases included altered gut microbiota, particularly an increased Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio and compromised gut barrier integrity, linked to increased GFAP expression. Faecal microbiota transplants and microbial metabolite analyses suggested a direct impact of the gut microbiota on astrocyte biology and markers of neuroinflammation. This review and meta-analysis describes the impact of the gut microbiota on astrocyte biology, and argues that the MGA axis is a promising therapeutic target for neurological disorders. However, it is clear that our understanding of the relationship between the gut microbiota and astrocyte behaviour is incomplete, including how different subtypes of astrocytes may be affected. Future studies must adopt new, multi-dimensional studies of astrocyte function and dysfunction, to elucidate their role in disease and explore the therapeutic potential of gut microbiota modulation. • Astrocyte Biology and MGA Axis : The review highlights how changes to astrocyte biology, indicated by variable GFAP expression, is associated with different neurological conditions, including acute brain injury, neurodegeneration (especially Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases), and mood disorders. • Type of Stress Affects Astrocyte Function: Through meta-analysis of GFAP expression, we identify for the first time that the source of stress that contributes to depressive-like behaviour in rodents variably affects astrocyte biology. Physiological stressors increase GFAP expression, whereas psychological stressors tend to reduce GFAP expression. • Common Mechanisms of Gut Dysbiosis : Despite disease-specific variations, common patterns such as reduced gut barrier integrity and increased Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio were identified across various neuropathologies, suggesting shared mechanisms in MGA axis perturbation. • Impact of Microbiota Manipulation : The therapeutic potential of microbiota manipulation, such as the use of probiotics and faecal microbiota transplants, are identified as promising methods for restoring BBB integrity and reducing neuroinflammation. • Sex and Age Bias in Research : The review identifies a significant bias towards male and younger rodent models in existing studies, calling for future research to include more female and older animals to better understand sex-specific and age-related effects on astrocyte biology and MGA axis interactions. Whereas traumatic brain injury and depression are less age-dependent, neurodegenerative diseases and stroke are more common in late life, and depression has a female preponderance.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,923
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0050,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,364
Écart entre enseignants0,329 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle