Notice bibliographique
Résumé
City films or city symphonies have been at the forefront for exploring and combing aesthetic, film process and storytelling, thus a great case for AI experimentation. With the emergence of AI digital content production applications (or Generative Artificial Intelligence - G.A.I.) such as image-based creations (Midjourney, Adobe Firefly) new opportunities for experimental filmmaking and screen production surface. The creative treatment of actuality requires a rethinking as we are now working with artificial or data source material and no longer recorded actualities. MEL 23:55 is an Experiment in AI image generation using Adobe Firefly and Midjourney for the visuals, which are in turn synched with AI audioscape produced with Melobytes. The research objectives was to explore the creative process when using GAI for city film production. An interesting observation is that Google image search does not recognise AI images locations. The city of Melbourne is referenced as being in Germany, Belgium or is referenced as Perth. The theoretical framework is underpinned by an examination of the city symphony phenomenon (Kinik, Hielscher and Jacobs 2018) and leveraging a recent formation of computational non-fiction. The city film is a documentary genre, that is also referred to as a city symphony while, also being described as a phenomenon (Jacobs, Hielscher and Kinik 2018). As a documentary format it facilitates exploration of cinematic language, visual grammar and non-fiction storytelling. There are numerous key-works across the 20th and 21st century, ranging from the Man With a Movie Camera Человек с кино-аппаратом (Chelovek s kino-apparatom) to Koyaanisqatsi. These city films are described as film events, cinematic experiences and experiments in cinematic communication. For Vertov the camera eye had mechanical augmentation; “I am kino-eye, I am mechanical eye. I, a machine shows you the world as only I can see it” (Vertov in Michelson 1984, 15). Reggio described his film experience as “until now, you’re never really seen the world you live in” (Reggio 1982). Could we prose an AI eye, and explore a computational vision of the world? City films or city symphonies have been at the forefront for exploring and combing aesthetic, film process and storytelling, thus a great case for AI experimentation. 21th century logic of documentary and explore emerging computational nonfiction (Miles 2017) formations. Recent literature proposes that non-human systems can become participative agents in the documentary production (Zimmerman 2017 and 2019, Cizek and Uricchio 2022, Kapur and Ansari 2022 among others) The research applies a Creative Practice Research approach (Batty and Kerrigan 2019, MCNamara 2012, Kerrigan and Callaghan 2016). Schleser has had an interest in the city film since his 2008 mobile feature film Max with a Keitai and is experimenting with AI, as an accessible production tool, in the making of a city film. Schleser has worked in alternative documentary traditions by combining Kinoks (Vertov in Michelson 1984), Cinéma Vertié and smartphone filmmaking approaches (Schleser 2021) and hopes to leverage this research approach into the GAI domain.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».