Development of a deep learning method for phase retrieval image enhancement in phase contrast microcomputed tomography
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Propagation-based imaging (one method of X-ray phase contrast imaging) with microcomputed tomography (PBI-µCT) offers the potential to visualise low-density materials, such as soft tissues and hydrogel constructs, which are difficult to be identified by conventional absorption-based contrast µCT. Conventional µCT reconstruction produces edge-enhanced contrast (EEC) images which preserve sharp boundaries but are susceptible to noise and do not provide consistent grey value representation for the same material. Meanwhile, phase retrieval (PR) algorithms can convert edge enhanced contrast to area contrast to improve signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) but usually results to over-smoothing, thus creating inaccuracies in quantitative analysis. To alleviate these problems, this study developed a deep learning-based method called edge view enhanced phase retrieval (EVEPR), by strategically integrating the complementary spatial features of denoised EEC and PR images, and further applied this method to segment the hydrogel constructs in vivo and ex vivo. EVEPR used paired denoised EEC and PR images to train a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) on a dataset-to-dataset basis. The CNN had been trained on important high-frequency details, for example, edges and boundaries from the EEC image and area contrast from PR images. The CNN predicted result showed enhanced area contrast beyond conventional PR algorithms while improving SNR and CNR. The enhanced CNR especially allowed for the image to be segmented with greater efficiency. EVEPR was applied to in vitro and ex vivo PBI-µCT images of low-density hydrogel constructs. The enhanced visibility and consistency of hydrogel constructs was essential for segmenting such material which usually exhibit extremely poor contrast. The EVEPR images allowed for more accurate segmentation with reduced manual adjustments. The efficiency in segmentation allowed for the generation of a sizeable database of segmented hydrogel scaffolds which were used in conventional data-driven segmentation applications. EVEPR was demonstrated to be a robust post-image processing method capable of significantly enhancing image quality by training a CNN on paired denoised EEC and PR images. This method not only addressed the common issues of over-smoothing and noise susceptibility in conventional PBI-µCT image processing but also allowed for efficient and accurate in vitro and ex vivo image processing applications of low-density materials.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle