Psychological well-being is the major determinant of global health in the first year following a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in children
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) represents a group of disorders with no known cure. IBD is impacted by biopsychosocial factors. The burden, psychosocial difficulties, and gene-environment interaction involved in the manifestation of IBD necessitate a fuller understanding of factors which worsen or ameliorate IBD. Case complexity (CC) captures current and historical biopsychosocial risks for individuals with IBD and holds promise for understanding variation in treatment response and individuals' experiences with IBD. The present study aimed to understand the relative contributions of: 1) historical vs. current factors impacting CC in predicting global health; and 2) biological, psychological, social, family, and health system factors on global health. Within a longitudinal design, 8–17-year-old youth ( N = 83) completed the self-report Pediatric Global Health 7 + 2 at diagnosis (baseline) and 4- and 12 months post-diagnosis. The p-IBD-INTERMED, a clinical-decision support tool, which standardizes inter-professional assessment of biopsychosocial risks contributing to CC was completed by the healthcare provider team at the same timepoints. CC was associated with global health at all time points (T1 r = −0.27; T2 r = −0.42; T3 r = −0.50). Hierarchical regression revealed that across time the relative contribution of historical CC was surpassed by current CC when predicting global health (at T1 β HCC= -0.13 ; β CCC = −0.17; at T3 β HCC = -0.04; β CCC = −0.48). In this cohort, at 4- and 12-months post diagnosis, psychological factors were the only domain of current CC to significantly predict global health, accounting for 29.1 % and 24.1 % of its variance respectively. Findings suggest that the global health of patients with IBD is not fixed by early life experiences. Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) represents a prevalent group of disorders with no known cure. IBD is impacted by myriad biopsychosocial factors. The pervasive burden, pronounced psychosocial difficulties, and the potential gene-environment interaction involved in the manifestation of IBD necessitate a fuller understanding of factors which might worsen or ameliorate IBD. Case complexity (CC) captures current and historical biopsychosocial risks for individuals with IBD and holds promise for understanding variation in treatment response and individuals' experiences with this chronic illness. Aims We sought to understand the relative contributions of: 1) historical vs. current factors impacting CC in predicting global health (self-reported); and 2) biological, psychological, social, family, and health system factors on global health. Methods Within a longitudinal design, 8–17-year-old youth ( N = 83) completed the self-report Pediatric Global Health 7 + 2 at diagnosis (baseline) and 4- and 12 months post-diagnosis. The p-IBD-INTERMED, an interview-based measure of CC, was completed by the healthcare provider team at the same timepoints. Results CC was associated with global health at all time points (T1 r = −0.27; T2 r = −0.42 ; T3 r = −0.50). Hierarchical regression revealed that across time points the relative contribution of historical CC was surpassed by current CC when predicting global health (at T1 β HCC= − 0.13 ; β CCC= − 0.17 ; at T3 β HCC= − 0.04 ; β CCC= − 0.48). In this cohort of newly diagnosed children that had good medical response by one-year post diagnosis, at 4- and 12-months post diagnosis, psychological factors were the only domain of current CC to significantly predict global health, accounting for 29.1 % and 24.1 % of its variance respectively. Discussion Findings suggest that the global health of IBD patients is not fixed by early life experiences and shed light onto potential psychosocial treatment targets.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».