1064 Longitudinal Association Between Co-Sleeping and Sleep Anxiety in a 6-year Child Cohort Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction The impact of co-sleeping on children and parents has been insufficiently explored in longitudinal research. Although previous studies have reported associations between co-sleeping and sleep problems, this study examines these relationships over a 6-year period using longitudinal data, especially in a country with high co-sleeping rates. Methods This study is based on a larger prospective child cohort study in South Korea. We used data from 2016 (Time 1) to 2021 (Time 6), and data was connected annually. The mean age of the children (n = 298) at baseline was 3.37 ± 0.87 years (50.00% girls). Sleep problems and sleeping arrangements were assessed using the Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ). Children who were reported sleeping in the same bed with other family members more than twice a week were categorized as co-sleeping. An autoregressive cross-lagged model (ACLM) was used to examine the relationship between children’s sleeping arrangements and sleep problems. Before conducting the ACLM, multiple imputations were performed to address missing data. Participants with missing data on co-sleeping variables or with more than 25% missing data were excluded. Results At Time 1, 94.97% of the children reported co-sleeping, with more than 70% of the sample co-sleeping at each time point. Sleep anxiety and co-sleeping showed a significant longitudinal relationship. Goodness-of-fit indices for the final model were adequate (CFI=0.940, TLI=0.934, RMSEA=0.080, and SRMR=0.086). All autoregressive paths between co-sleeping (ORs=1.29-4.71) and sleep anxiety (βs=0.61-0.79) were significant. From Time 2 to 4, high levels of sleep anxiety at the previous time point significantly increased the likelihood of co-sleeping at the subsequent time point (ORs=1.20-1.22). From Time 3 to 6, co-sleeping at the previous time point significantly predicted greater sleep anxiety at the next time point (βs=0.14-0.20). Conclusion Our findings indicate that co-sleeping was longitudinally associated with sleep anxiety. Specifically, while sleep anxiety may lead to co-sleeping during early childhood, the influence of co-sleeping on sleep anxiety appears to become more pronounced as children grow older. Support (if any) This research was supported by a grant of the R&D project, funded by the National Center for Mental Health (grant number: MHER22B03).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».