MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4410505397 · doi:10.1002/mdc3.70130

Cerebellar Dentate Cavernoma Enlargement and Tremor Emergence: Longitudinal Neuroimaging Analysis of Case Report and Literature Review

2025· article· en· W4410505397 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Andrew Yang, Thalyta Alves Rodrigues, Sriranga Kashyap, Yash Patel, Arjun Balachandar, Benjamin Davidson, Can Sarica, Rafael E. Buongermini, Artur Vetkas, Abu Bakar Butt, Jürgen Germann, Alfonso Fasano, Suneil K. Kalia, Andrés M. Lozano, Marie Slegr, Alexandre Boutet

Notice bibliographique

RevueMovement Disorders Clinical Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNeurological disorders and treatments
Établissements canadiensWestern UniversitySunnybrook Health Science CentreToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkSunnybrook Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDentate nucleusNeuroimagingNeuroscienceCerebellumPsychologyMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Cavernoma, cavernous angioma, or cerebral cavernous malformation, is a central nervous system vascular pathology.1 These acquired lesions are typically asymptomatic, but can cause seizures, headaches, hemorrhage, and, infrequently, tremors.1 This study reports an atypical unilateral action and rest tremor emerging concurrently with a cavernoma in the ipsilateral cerebellar dentate nucleus (DN). The hypothesis is that lesion growth disrupts the motor pathway dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRTT), precipitating tremor onset. The study aims to (1) quantify cavernoma volume change; (2) examine lesion increase in relation to neurocircuitry; and (3) compare findings to a literature review of tremors and cavernomas. A 60-year-old right-handed woman presented with a right-hand tremor that emerged 4 months prior. History included a transient episode of right arm heaviness with tingling and an episode of a painless visual aura of migraine 16 years prior. Her 88-year-old father was described as having “shaky” hands but otherwise healthy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a right DN cavernoma, which was first identified incidentally 16 years ago, where she was followed conservatively by her vascular surgeon and received routine MRIs in 2008, 2016, and 2018. When tremor emerged in 2024, her neurologist ordered an MRI. Neurological examination showed a mild right-handed intermittent tremor, more predominant with action, but also present at rest. The tremor reportedly worsened when anxious or when excess caffeine is consumed. Negatives for essential tremor included no bilaterality of symptoms and ataxia, whereas for parkinsonism included no bradykinesia, rigidity, and constipation, as well as no changes in voice, facial expression, writing, manual dexterity, muscle tone, or gait. For management, she chose monitoring rather than medication or surgical treatment. The methodology (see Data S1) involved segmenting cavernoma MRIs from 2008, 2016, 2018, and 2024, (Fig. 1A), quantifying volumes (Fig. 1B), tractography to examine lesion relation to the DRTT (Fig. 1C), and a literature search regarding cavernomas and tremors (Fig. 2A,B). Results revealed progressive lesion growth: 93 mm3 in 2008, 1388 mm3 in 2016, 1442 mm3 in 2018, and 1633 mm3 in 2024 (Fig. 1A,B). Tractography provided patient-specific DRTT, which, when compared to longitudinal cavernoma segmentations, indicated recent lesion impingement in 2024 (Fig. 1C,D). The literature review yielded no publications of tremor caused by cerebellar DN cavernoma (Fig. 2A). A subsequent search identified eight articles of secondary parkinsonism due to cavernoma (Fig. 2B,C). Locations were the basal ganglia (n = 3/8), ventral mesencephalon (n = 3/8), insula (n = 1/8), and pineal region (n = 1/8). Median age was 53 (5 female/3 male), median tremor duration was 3 months, and diameters spanned 10 to 20 mm. Dopaminergic treatment for five of eight patients led to one improvement, while three of eight received surgery with two improvements. The present study reports the atypical emergence of tremor coinciding with cavernoma enlargement revealed via longitudinal neuroimaging analysis. This is unique given the cavernoma location in the DN, its growth disrupting the DRTT, and its temporal association with the notable presence of both rest and action tremor. The quantitative volume change is noteworthy as the visual radiological interpretation reported the lesion as stable.2 Potential mechanisms include mass effect, hemorrhage, neuroinflammatory response, or ischemia.3, 4 The literature review of cavernomas in the cerebellar DN causing tremors yielded no articles, highlighting the case's rarity. The DN, a critical hub for cerebellar output, integrates motor and cognitive functions through its projections along the DRTT, facilitating cerebello-thalamo-cortical communication essential for movement and high-order cognitive processes.4 Other types of DN lesions can cause motor and non-motor symptoms depending on location, such as action tremor (but not rest), ataxia, dystonia, and cognitive impairments.4, 5 Tremors ensuing from cerebellar lesions include Holmes tremor, previously known as rubral tremor, and cerebellar outflow tremor.6 Holmes tremor is often irregular, of high amplitude, and present at rest, intensifying with action and posture.7 However, Holmes tremor usually localizes to the brainstem or diencephalon.7 Alternatively, parkinsonism is worth considering, given the DRTT implicated in its pathophysiology.8 Yet, although the patient presented with unilateral rest tremor, which is typical of parkinsonism, her action tremor and lack of bradykinesia questions this diagnosis. Although the eight literature cases support the causative relation of cavernoma and parkinsonism, the lesions were in regions other than the cerebellar DN, complicating diagnosis. According to tremor guidelines, “indeterminate tremor syndrome” is appropriate and further monitoring is required for diagnosis, which corresponds with the patient's preferred management plan.9 Cavernoma treatment varies according to size, patient preference, symptom severity, and location.1 The first treatment consideration is often open cranial surgery with promising evidence for stereotactic techniques (reasonable outcomes of cerebellar cavernoma surgery was reported as 129/141 = 91%).10 Further research is required to elucidate the relationship between cavernoma in the DN and tremor, and this study has limitations, namely that it is a single case report with manual segmentations. Overall, this study reports the unusual emergence of action and rest tremor potentially because of an enlarging cavernoma in the DN now impinging on the DRTT, which may guide future diagnoses and prevent misdiagnoses. (1) Research project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution. (2) Manuscript Preparation: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique. A. Z. Y.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B T. R.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B S. K.: 1C, 2A, 2B Y. P.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B A. B.: 1C, 2A, 2B B.A.D.: 2A, 2B C.S.: 2A, 2B R.E.B.: 2A, 2B A.V.: 2A, 2B A.B.B.: 1C, 2A, 2B J.G.: 2A, 2B A.F.: 2A, 2B S.K.K.: 2A, 2B A.M.L.: 2A, 2B M.S.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B A.B.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B We thank the patient for their willingness to publish their case. Ethical Compliance Statement: The authors confirm that the approval of an institutional review board was not required for this work. The subject has provided written informed consent to publish their case, including the publication of images and details of their medical history. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines. Funding Sources and Conflict of Interest: No specific funding was received for this work. The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this work. Financial Disclosures for the Previous 12 Months: The authors declare no additional disclosures to report. AL is a consultant to Abbott, Boston Scientific, Insightec, Medtronic and Functional Neuromodulation (Scientific Director). AF received consultancy fees from Abbie, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Dompe Farmaceutici, Ipsen, Iota, and Syneos Health. Advisory Boards: Abbvie, Boston Scientific, Ceregate and Ipsen. Honoraria: Abbvie, Abbott, American Academy of Neurology, Boston Scientific, Brainlab, Ipsen, Medtronic, Merz, Movement Disorders Society, Sunovion, Paladin Labs, UCB, Sunovion. Grants: Abbvie, Boston Scientific, Dystonia Medical Research Foundation, University of Toronto, Michael J Fox Foundation, Medtronic, MSA coalition, Praxis, ES. Royalties: Springer. CS has been receiving fellowship grants from Michael and Amira Dan Foundation and Turkish Neurosurgical Society. SKK receives honoraria, consulting, and/or speaker fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, inBrain, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Parkinson Canada, and Movement Disorders Society; and research support from Parkinson Canada, CIHR, MJFF, FUS Foundation, MitoO2, Toronto Western Hospital Foundation, Weston Foundation, and RR Tasker Chair in Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. KY received a consulting fee from Insightec. Other authors have no disclosures to report. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. Data S1. Supplementary materials: Additional methods for the manuscript “Cerebellar Dentate Cavernoma Enlargement and Tremor Emergence: Longitudinal Neuroimaging Analysis of Case Report and Literature Review”. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,169
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,783

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,411
Écart entre enseignants0,380 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMovement Disorders Clinical PracticeMême sujetNeurological disorders and treatmentsTravaux en français237 207