MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4410512920 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0390.pv273

TITLE: HYPERPIGMENTATION AS AN ADVERSE EFFECT OF ANTIMALARIAL USE AND THE ASSOCIATION WITH RETINOPATHY AND PREDISPOSING FACTORS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2025· review· en· W4410512920 sur OpenAlexaffvenue
Maria Gabriela Rodriguez Herrera, Cheryl F. Rosen, Zaid Saeed Kamil, Darshana Seeburruth, Ani Orchanian‐Cheff, S. Krishnan

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHyperpigmentationAdverse effectDermatologyRetinopathySkin hyperpigmentationMEDLINEInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

PV273 / #773 Poster Topic: AS24 - SLE-Treatment Background/Purpose Antimalarials are essential in treating various dermatological and rheumatological conditions like systemic lupus erythematosus. Hyperpigmentation is a known side effect, most often seen with chloroquine than hydroxychloroquine, affecting over 25% of users after prolonged use. These drugs alter antigen processing and increase lysosomal pH, affecting the skin by modifying UV absorption and inflammatory mediators. Antimalarial drugs can bind to iron and melanin, which stimulates melanocytes and may cause increased pigmentation in the skin. While the exact link between hyperpigmentation and retinopathy is not fully established, reports have suggested a possible association. Retinal toxicity is more likely to occur with chloroquine and higher doses of hydroxychloroquine. Studies suggest that factors like ecchymosis and the use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents may influence hyperpigmentation. This study explores the relationship between antimalarial use and mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation, considering factors such as retinopathy, trauma/ecchymosis, and concurrent anticoagulant use. Methods We have conducted a systematic review to examine the association between antimalarial use and hyperpigmentation and the possible link to retinopathy and predisposing factors. A comprehensive search strategy was developed using a combination of database-specific subject headings and text words for the main concepts of hyperpigmentation and the drugs chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine. Results were limited to humans. Studies from 1960 to May 2024, including cohort, cross-sectional, case reports, and case series, were identified on September 5, 2024 through Ovid MEDLINE and Embase. A total of 1760 studies were screened, and 71 studies were extracted and included in the review. The reference lists of included publications were also searched and considered for inclusion. A supplementary search was conducted on Google Scholar on December 26, 2024, using the following search terms: hyperpigmentation, antimalarial, drug adverse effect, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, skin pigmentation, antimalarial side effects. The first 100 results from that search were screened. Results The analysis involved 71 studies with a total sample size of 318 patients. Of these, 89.6% were female and 7.2% were male. The most common diagnosis was systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), accounting for 74.6% of patients, followed by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 8.8%. Other diagnoses included Sjögren’s syndrome (6%), discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) (4.1%), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (0.9%), and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) (0.3%). There were 4.7% of patients with other conditions, and 0.3% had no report on the diagnosis. In terms of treatment, 70.4% of patients were treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), 17.6% with chloroquine, and 6.3% with other combinations of antimalarials. Hyperpigmentation was mostly blue-gray (9.9%), with the face and neck (40.5%), legs (34.6%), and hands (21.6%) being the most affected areas. Preceding ecchymosis was reported in 23.5%, and 18.5% were using anticoagulants/antiplatelets. Biopsies were performed in 27.5% of cases. Retinopathy was noted in 3.1%, with no strong correlation to hyperpigmentation. Of those who discontinued antimalarials (52.2%), 35.5% experienced fading pigmentation, with partial (24.2%) or complete (10.6%) resolution. Conclusions Hyperpigmentation is a common side effect of antimalarials. No correlation was found with the presence of hyperpigmentation and retinopathy with use of hydroxychloroquine. The role of anticoagulants and ecchymosis remains uncertain. Discontinuation of antimalarials does not always lead to the resolution of pigmentation. Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms of hyperpigmentation and improve its treatment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,025

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,019
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0070,005
Bibliométrie0,0100,014
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,287 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of RheumatologyMême sujetAcne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsTravaux en français237 207