RESPONSE TO HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE IN IMMUNE THROMBOCYTOPENIA IN CHILDHOOD-ONSET SLE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PV166 / #638 Poster Topic: AS18 - Pediatric SLE Background/Purpose The management of immune thrombocytopenia in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) is diverse and yet to be standardized. We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the treatment of thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100× 10^9/L) associated with cSLE. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who developed thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 × 10^9/L) and were followed in the SLE clinic at The Hospital for Sick Children, between January 2015 and December 2022. Definite cSLE was defined by ANA titer ≥ 1:160 measured by immunofluorescence and ≥10 points according to the 2019 EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria, while patients with incipient cSLE were ANA positive, had clinical features of evolving SLE but achieved a score below 10. Complete response was defined as a platelet count >100 x 10^9/L with no bleeding. Partial response was defined as a platelet count >30 x 10^9/L with at least a 2-fold increase of the baseline count and no bleeding. Qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Of the 265 patient records reviewed (201 with definite cSLE and 64 with incipient cSLE), 55 (21%) patients had thrombocytopenia (Table 1). Nine patients with thrombocytopenia secondary to other causes, such as medications related or infections, were excluded. Forty-six patients (70% female), with a median age of 12.9 years (IQR 10.6 - 14.9) and median platelet count of 16.5 × 10^9/L (IQR 6 - 61) at time of thrombocytopenia diagnosis were included. The median lowest platelet count was 6 × 10^9/L (IQR 2 - 31). Twenty-eight (61%) patients had definite cSLE, while 18 (39%) had incipient cSLE. Median SLEDAI score at cSLE diagnosis (for definite SLE) was 7 (IQR 5 - 12). Thirty-one (67%) patients were treated with corticosteroids and/or IVIG prior to commencing HCQ, and 10 of them (22%) also required 1 or more additional treatments for thrombocytopenia (ie, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, eltrombopag, romiplostim, rituximab, or cyclophosphamide). Thirteen (28%) patients achieved either a complete or partial response prior to initiating HCQ. Forty-one (89%) patients were treated with HCQ during their disease course. HCQ was initiated at a median of 6 months (IQR 2.7-12.2) after thrombocytopenia diagnosis at a median platelet count of 65 × 10^9/L (IQR 19-131). Twenty-six (63%) of the patients treated with HCQ had a complete or partial response at 12 weeks after initiating HCQ. Fourteen (34%) patients required additional treatment for thrombocytopenia during this time. Forty-three (93%) patients had either complete (n=39) or partial response (n=4) after 1 year and/or at the end of follow-up, including 38 (93%) who received HCQ. The median follow-up time was 27 months (IQR 12.7-52). At the end of follow-up, only 3 patients required a second drug (either sirolimus, eltrombopag, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine). Only 1 patient discontinued HCQ due to side effects (headache). Table 1. Demographics of Patients Included In Analysis Conclusions In a cohort of children with definite or incipient cSLE, we observed successful management of thrombocytopenia on HCQ monotherapy nearly 2 years after their onset, although two-thirds required immunosuppression at presentation. Further analysis will identify characteristics that predict response to HCQ monotherapy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».