MACROPHAGE ACTIVATION SYNDROME IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS: REPORT OF 8 CASES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PV202 / #141 Poster Topic: AS23 - SLE-Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Background/Purpose Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease that is characterized by various clinical and biological manifestations. Among its rare but critical presentations, macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a severe complication involving the dysregulated activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and NK cells, leading to systemic inflammation and multiple organ damage. MAS is a secondary form of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Diagnosis of MAS poses a real challenge, as its clinical manifestations closely resemble those of active SLE. We present a series of cases aimed at detailing the distinctive clinical features of MAS in SLE. Methods This was a retrospective and descriptive study involving 8 cases collected from the internal medicine department over a period of 14 years, from January 2010 to May 2024. The diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus was established according to the SLICC or ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria, and patients presented with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) according to the HLH 2004 criteria. Results Eight patients were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 26 years (range, 17-42 years). There were 7 women and 1 man, resulting in a sex ratio of 7/1. MAS was the initial manifestation of lupus in half of the patients (4 women), while it occurred after the diagnosis of lupus in the other 4 patients. A triggering factor was identified in all patients (infection in 3 patients, pregnancy in 3 patients, and a stressful event in the other 2). Lupus was severe in all the patients. The systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) was calculated for all 8 patients, with an average score of 61.38, a standard deviation of 19.29, a median of 60.5, and a range from 32 to 88. Hematological involvement was observed in 87.5% of the patients (7 cases), cutaneous involvement in 62.5% (5 cases), articular involvement in 50% (4 cases), severe renal involvement in 37.5% (3 cases), serositis in 25% (2 cases), and pancreatitis in 12.5% (1 case). Biologically, pancytopenia was found in 6 patients (75%), and bicytopenia was found in the other 2 patients. Lymphopenia and hyperferritinemia were constant in all patients, with an average lymphocyte count of 680 cells/mm³ and average ferritin level of 4786 ng/mL, ranging from 800 to 11816 ng/mL. Hypofibrinogenemia was observed in 5 patients, with an average fibrinogen level of approximately 1.19 g/L, ranging from 0.3 g/L to 1.5 g/L. Hypertriglyceridemia was noted in 4 patients, with an average of approximately 4.865 g/L, ranging from 3.60 g/L to 6.42 g/L. The complement levels C3, C4, and CH50 were severely reduced in all patients. Antinuclear antibodies were more than 1/80 in all patients, and anti-DNA antibodies were positive in 75% of the patients. All patients received intravenous bolus corticosteroid therapy, antibiotic treatment in 3 patients, and immunosuppressants in 4 patients (2 patients received cyclophosphamide and 2 received mycophenolate mofetil). The outcome was favorable in 75% of the cases, with death recorded in 25%. Conclusions Macrophage activation syndrome is a severe and potentially fatal complication of systemic lupus erythematosus that requires heightened vigilance for early diagnosis and prompt management. Our study revealed that MAS is often triggered by infection, pregnancy, and stress. The clinical manifestations of MAS frequently overlap with those of active SLE, complicating diagnosis. This study highlights the necessity for early detection and appropriate therapeutic interventions to effectively manage MAS in SLE patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».