MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4410513034 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0390.pv212

OUTCOMES OF ADULTS WITH CHILDHOOD-ONSET SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOUS: A SCOPING REVIEW

2025· review· en· W4410513034 sur OpenAlexaffvenue
Lily Siok Hoon Lim, Michael Moore, Kaien Gu, Carol Cooke

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineSystemic lupusSystemic lupus erythematosusSystemic diseasePediatricsDermatologyImmunopathologyImmunologyInternal medicineDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

PV212 / #397 Poster Topic: AS23 - SLE-Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Background/Purpose Systemic Lupus Erythematous (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem autoimmune disorder with a highly variable presentation and course. Approximately 20% of SLE cases are diagnosed within childhood. As increasing numbers of childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) patients are now seen surviving into adulthood, understanding their adulthood outcomes has become increasingly important. This scoping review aims to summarize the outcomes of adults with cSLE. Methods A peer-reviewed search strategy of OVID MEDLINE and Embase for English articles between 1 January 1990 to 30 June 2023 was developed with an academic librarian. The main search included all systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) and systemic vasculitides. This abstract focuses on only SLE studies. Our search was tested against 26 known SARD articles to verify search coverage. Childhood-onset of disease was as defined by authors (< 14-18 years old). Studies were excluded if: i) > 50% of the sample were not adults at final assessment and / or adult outcomes were not separately reported, iii) not a full-length article. Results from the search were uploaded into the Covidence website for subsequent workflow. Studies were graded for risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QuiPS) tool. Two reviewers independently graded the studies before meeting to reach consensus. Any disputes were resolved by a third reviewer. Results The total search identified 4379 papers, of which 24 SLE studies were included for this study. No study was published before 2000, 2 (8%) between 2001-2010, 16 (67%) between 2011-2020, and 6 (25%) between 2021-2024. Most studies were conducted in the United States (25%), Brazil (21%), and the Europe (13%). The vast majority of publications were cross-sectional in design (67%), followed by prospective cohorts (21%). Mean disease duration ranged from 5.5-23.9 years (13 studies) and median duration was 8.1-20 years (6 studies). Mean follow-up duration of longitudinal studies ranged from 6.3-14.2 years (4 studies) and median was 4 years (1 study). The most common reported outcomes were damage (50%), disease activity (38%) and mortality (21%). Other outcomes studied were depression, cognitive dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and clinical features. Mean SLICC damage index was 1.3-3.2 (4 studies) and median damage was 1-6 (5 studies), respectively. Mean and median SLE disease activity index [MM2] was 6.0-16 (4 studies) and median was 0-6 (5 studies), respectively. Mortality ranged from 2.5%-18.3% (5 studies). QuiPS identified a moderate to high risk-of-bias in the following domains: 92% of study participation, 100% of study attrition (N = 8, non-cross-sectional studies), 25% of prognostic factors, 71% of outcomes, 96% of confounding, 75% of statistical analysis. Conclusions There is increasing interest in the outcomes of cSLE adults as seen in the increasing number of publications. Current literature primarily focuses on disease damage, disease activity, and mortality. However, the studies showed significant biases, which perhaps reflects the difficulty of studying such a population. A collaborative and integrated approach between pediatric and adult rheumatologists to follow cSLE patients into adulthood, augmented by additional information sources such as population health data, will be essential to better understand the outcomes of cSLE patients with a wide spectrum of disease severity. Understanding current outcomes will inform better care for cSLE adults.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,057

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,057
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0070,006
Bibliométrie0,0200,021
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,351
Écart entre enseignants0,325 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Même sujetSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→Travaux en français237 207→