THE HEART OF IT ALL: DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY AS THE INITIAL PRESENTATION OF ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PV280 / #741 Case Report Poster Topic: AS03 - Antiphospholipid Syndrome Late-Breaking Abstract Introduction Cardiac manifestations in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) range from mild valvular disease, to more devastating disorders associated with morbidity and mortality. Cardiomyopathy has seldom been reported as the initial manifestation of the disease. Therefore, we present the case of a 47 year-old lady with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) as the initial presentation of APS. Case Presentation With Investigation A 47-year-old lady, previously healthy with no known comorbidities, presented with acute dyspnea. This started hours prior to presentation. She described orthopnoea as well as gradual worsening of lower limb edema in the preceding days. The patient had no cardiac family history, and was a nonsmoker and teetotal. Chest auscultation revealed crackles up till the lung apices. Further examination confirmed an elevated jugular venous pulse, as well as pitting lower limb edema extending to the thighs bilaterally. Oxygen saturations were 89% on room air, correcting with oxygen. Inspection revealed livedo reticularis of the thighs and arms. A bedside echocardiogram revealed severe diastolic dysfunction. An NT-proBNP assay was elevated at 35,000 pg/mL. The patient was admitted under the cardiologists for diuresis and investigation. The patient underqent a coronary angiogram, which showed fully patent coronary arteries. A Cardiac MRI confirmed the presence of an advanced DCM, with thickening of the mitral and tricuspid valvular apparatus. Rheumatology was consulted in view of these findings. The patient tested positive for lupus anticoagulant, anti-β2 glycoprotein antibodies (IgG and IgM > 200 IU/mL) and anticardiolipin antibodies (IgG and IgM > 120 IU/mL). A double-stranded DNA antibody assay was negative, with normal complement protein levels. She denied a history of thrombotic episodes and miscarriages. A diagnosis of primary APS causing DCM was made, and warfarin, corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil and heart failure optimization were initiated. The patient subsequently improved and was discharged home. Literature Review The etiological basis of DCM in APS is hypothesized to be microvascular thrombotic insults,[1] as evidenced by autopsy studies. Recurrent microthrombotic inflammatory activity has been associated with a risk of progression to DCM, with contributions from myofibroblasts and fibromuscular remodeling of the myoendocardium. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and transforming growth factor beta are the main cytokines implicated in this process. APS patients, particularly primary APS patients and those with strongly positive serology, have been shown to exhibit asymptomatic diastolic dysfunction in up to 20% of cases.[1] This suggests that the remodeling changes in the myocardium are asymptomatic and subclinical, yet capable of having catastrophic consequences. Immunosuppression and anticoagulation have shown success in the sparse case reports of APS-DCM in the literature, particularly with mycophenolate and IVIG.[1] Discussion The key learning points from this case are: 1. All women of middle-age and younger, presenting or having been diagnosed with DCM, should be screened for APS. 2. Cardiac MRI was, in this case, a reliable surrogate to endomyocardial biopsy. Further studies are needed to validate this. 3. Female sex, younger age and strongly positive serology are associated with an increased risk of DCM in APS patients. 4. Up to 20% of APS patients can have subclinical diastolic dysfunction. The authors recommend echocardiographic screening in view of the events of this case. 5. The etiology of APS-DCM is related to microvascular thrombosis, and therefore coronary angiography and macrovascular imaging will be normal in such cases. 6. Management involves warfarinization and immunosuppression with steroids and DMARDs. Reference: [1.] Coletto L. Autoimmun Rev 2022;21:102990.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».