MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4410513077 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0390.pv135

IDENTIFICATION OF FOXM1 AS A CANDIDATE DRIVER OF SLE AUTOIMMUNITY AND LUPUS NEPHRITIS

2025· article· en· W4410513077 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mary K. Crow, Kyriakos A. Kirou, Emily Wu, Mikhail Olferiev

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSouth Asian Studies and Conflicts
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineLupus nephritisAutoimmunityImmunologyNephritisSystemic lupus erythematosusIdentification (biology)Autoimmune diseaseLupus erythematosusDermatologyInternal medicineDiseaseAntibody

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

PV135 / #415 Poster Topic: AS16 - Lupus Nephritis-Pathogenesis Background/Purpose Among the variable organ system manifestations experienced by patients with SLE, lupus nephritis (LN) is both common, affecting approximately 60% of patients, and severe. Patients with LN are characterized by enrichment in particular autoantibodies, including anti-double-stranded (ds)DNA and anti-Smith (Sm). We studied PBMC from our longitudinal SLE patient cohort and characterized gene transcripts that are correlated with levels of LN-associated autoantibodies. We focused on those transcripts that identify pathways and mechanisms that are particularly related to production of anti-dsDNA and/or anti-Sm autoantibodies compared to those associated with production of autoantibodies that are more generally characteristic of systemic autoimmunity, such as anti-Ro52. Understanding the mechanisms involved in development of pathogenic lupus autoantibodies could lead to identification of novel therapeutic targets. Methods Subjects included 80 SLE patients from our longitudinal SLE patient cohort at Hospital for Special Surgery. Samples were collected at 1 to 14 visits over a period of 3 (0-12) years, with an average of 4 time points per patient. Plasma levels of autoantibodies present in each patient sample were determined based on clinical assays and antigen array. RNA sequencing of patient PBMC was performed and the obtained data matrix of autoantibody levels and gene transcripts used to generate functionally annotated groups of co-expressed genes using the Weighted Gene Co-expression Analysis (WGCNA) algorithm. Comparison of autoantibody titers with gene expression was analyzed by linear mixed model, using either a per module or per gene approach. Transcripts associated with levels of pathogenic autoantibodies (anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm/RNP) were identified and their mechanisms of regulation assessed by literature review. Results Clusters of specific autoantibodies were identified based on degree of correlation between their titer and the level of expression of individual mRNA transcripts. Titers of LN-associated autoantibodies were highly associated with expression of cell cycle genes. Among those, the most significant correlations (p < 10^-5) were seen for TK1, AURKB, KIFC1, KIF15, FOXM1, GINS2, NGAPG, CDC45, CDCA5, CCNA1 , and CCNB1 . In contrast, the cluster of autoantibodies that are not associated with LN (eg, anti-Ro52) did not show an association with cell cycle transcripts. Based on literature review of the identified cell cycle-related genes, FOXM1 , encoding an important transcription factor, is itself a key regulator of many of the cell cycle transcripts identified in this analysis. Conclusions Our data indicate that cell cycle-related gene transcripts are associated with plasma levels of pathogenic autoantibodies implicated in LN (anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm) in contrast to anti-Ro52 autoantibodies that represent a more general measure of systemic autoimmunity. Of those cell cycle-related transcripts, FOXM1 is not only highly associated with elevated levels of pathogenic lupus autoantibodies, but is also identified as a critical regulator of many of the other cell cycle-related genes associated with high level pathogenic autoantibodies. FOXM1 is recognized as a critical regulator of malignant cells, is considered a therapeutic target in oncology, and pharmacologic inhibitors are in development for a number of malignancies. Characterization of the specific roles played by FOXM1 in the regulation of autoimmunity may provide the rationale for that transcription factor serving as a novel therapeutic target for LN.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,149
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,713

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of RheumatologyMême sujetSouth Asian Studies and ConflictsTravaux en français237 207